Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36347938›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Intellectually able adults with autism spectrum disorder show typical resting-state EEG activity.

Qianliang Li, Ricarda F Weiland, Ivana Konvalinka, Huibert D Mansvelder, Tobias S Andersen, Dirk J A Smit, Sander Begeer, Klaus Linkenkaer-Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Task-Related Aperiodic EEG (1/f) Activity in Autism.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qianliang Li *Section for Cognitive Systems, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science (DTU Compute), Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Ricarda F Weiland *Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Department of Clinical- Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ivana KonvalinkaSection for Cognitive Systems, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science (DTU Compute), Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Huibert D MansvelderDepartment of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research (CNCR), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tobias S AndersenSection for Cognitive Systems, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science (DTU Compute), Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Dirk J A SmitAmsterdam Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sander BegeerFaculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Department of Clinical- Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Klaus Linkenkaer-HansenDepartment of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research (CNCR), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. klaus.linkenkaer@cncr.vu.nl.

Funding

ZonMw 2017/02015/ZONMW
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is broad interest in discovering quantifiable physiological biomarkers for psychiatric disorders to aid diagnostic assessment. However, finding biomarkers for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has proven particularly difficult, partly due to high heterogeneity. Here, we recorded five minutes eyes-closed rest electroencephalography (EEG) from 186 adults (51% with ASD and 49% without ASD) and investigated the potential of EEG biomarkers to classify ASD using three conventional machine learning models with two-layer cross-validation. Comprehensive characterization of spectral, temporal and spatial dimensions of source-modelled EEG resulted in 3443 biomarkers per recording. We found no significant group-mean or group-variance differences for any of the EEG features. Interestingly, we obtained validation accuracies above 80%; however, the best machine learning model merely distinguished ASD from the non-autistic comparison group with a mean balanced test accuracy of 56% on the entirely unseen test set. The large drop in model performance between validation and testing, stress the importance of rigorous model evaluation, and further highlights the high heterogeneity in ASD. Overall, the lack of significant differences and weak classification indicates that, at the group level, intellectually able adults with ASD show remarkably typical resting-state EEG.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAdultBiomarkersElectroencephalographyHumansMachine LearningRestBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID36347938
PMCPMC9643446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.