Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36347900›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Comparison of open and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy approaches using multicentric data (UroCCR-47 study).

A Ingels, K Bensalah, J B Beauval, P Paparel, M Rouprêt, H Lang, F X Nouhaud, F Hénon, F Bruyère, F Audenet and 15 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03293563 (UroCCR Database), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03293563 recruitingnot on this map

UroCCR Database: French Research Network for Kidney Cancer (National Multidisciplinary Clinical and Biological Database on Kidney Cancer)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BordeauxRan2011 to 2040Enrolled30,000ConditionsKidney CancerArmsRadical nephrectomy versus partial nephrectomy (according surgeon judgement)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Complications and blood loss after invasive treatments for small renal masses A systematic review.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Review
  14. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy using the HugoCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.

A IngelsDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Henri Mondor, APHP, Créteil, France. alexandre.ingels@aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-0043-6520
K BensalahDepartment of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
J B BeauvalDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Rangueil, Toulouse, France.
P PaparelDepartment of Urology, Lyon Sud Hospital, HCL, Pierre-Bénite, France.
M RouprêtDepartment of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, APHP, Paris, France.
H LangDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
F X NouhaudDepartment of Urology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
F HénonDepartment of Urology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.
F BruyèreDepartment of Urology, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France.
F AudenetDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France.
C LebacleDepartment of Urology, Bicêtre University Hospital, APHP, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
H BaumertDepartment of Urology, Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital, Paris, France.
J A LongDepartment of Urology, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
R TambweDepartment of Urology, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France.
T CharlesDepartment of Urology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.
E XylinasDepartment of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
T WaeckelDepartment of Urology, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France.
C MichielsDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
J AsselineauClinical Epidemiology Unit (USMR), CHU Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
A BénardClinical Epidemiology Unit (USMR), CHU Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
G MargueDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
R BoissierDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, La Conception University Hospital, APHM, Marseille, France.
P BigotDepartment of Urology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
J C BernhardDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8564-1699
Comité Cancer de l’Association Francaise d’Urologie (CCAFU)
French Clinical Research Infrastructure Network · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRHôpital Pellegrin · FRHôpital Rangueil · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRBicêtre Hospital · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRHôpital de la Conception · FRHôpital Foch · FRHôpital Paris Saint-Joseph · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRInserm · FRInstitut de Cancérologie Strasbourg · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRMédipole Garonne · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) using contemporary data to respond to unmet clinical needs. Data from patients included in the registry who underwent partial nephrectomy between January 01, 2014 and June 30, 2017 within 20 centres of the French Network for Research on Kidney Cancer UroCCR were collected (NCT03293563). Statistical methods included adjusted multivariable analyses. Rates of peri- and post-operative transfusion, and of surgical revision, were lower in the RPN (n = 1434) than the OPN (n = 571) group (2.9% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.0012; 3.8% vs. 11.5%, p < 0.0001; 2.4% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.0001, respectively). In multivariable analyses, RPN was independently associated with fewer early post-operative complications than OPN (overall: odds-ratio [95% confidence interval, CI] = 0.48 [0.35-0.66]; severe: 0.29 [0.16-0.54], p < 0.0001 for both) and shorter hospital stays (34% [30%; 37%], p < 0.0001). RPN was also a significantly associated with a decresedrisk of post-operative acute renal failure, and new-onset chronic kidney disease at 3 and 12 months post-surgery. There were no between-group differences in oncological outcomes. In comparison with OPN, RPN was associated with improved peri- and post-operative morbidity, better functional outcomes, and shorter hospital stays. Our results support the use of RPN, even for large and complex tumours.

Indexed as

Kidney NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansNephrectomyRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36347900
PMCPMC9643517
OpenAlexW4308527148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.