Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36347858›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Systematic tissue annotations of genomics samples by modeling unstructured metadata.

Nathaniel T Hawkins, Marc Maldaver, Anna Yannakopoulos, Lindsay A Guare, Arjun Krishnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nathaniel T HawkinsDepartment of Computational Mathematics, Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Marc MaldaverDepartment of Computational Mathematics, Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9689-2768
Anna YannakopoulosDepartment of Computational Mathematics, Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Lindsay A GuareDepartment of Computational Mathematics, Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6988-5319
Arjun KrishnanDepartment of Computational Mathematics, Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. arjun.krishnan@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7980-4110

Funding

Resolving and understanding the genomic basis of heterogeneous complex traits and diseasesR35GM128765 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KRISHNAN, ARJUN · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are currently >1.3 million human -omics samples that are publicly available. This valuable resource remains acutely underused because discovering particular samples from this ever-growing data collection remains a significant challenge. The major impediment is that sample attributes are routinely described using varied terminologies written in unstructured natural language. We propose a natural-language-processing-based machine learning approach (NLP-ML) to infer tissue and cell-type annotations for genomics samples based only on their free-text metadata. NLP-ML works by creating numerical representations of sample descriptions and using these representations as features in a supervised learning classifier that predicts tissue/cell-type terms. Our approach significantly outperforms an advanced graph-based reasoning annotation method (MetaSRA) and a baseline exact string matching method (TAGGER). Model similarities between related tissues demonstrate that NLP-ML models capture biologically-meaningful signals in text. Additionally, these models correctly classify tissue-associated biological processes and diseases based on their text descriptions alone. NLP-ML models are nearly as accurate as models based on gene-expression profiles in predicting sample tissue annotations but have the distinct capability to classify samples irrespective of the genomics experiment type based on their text metadata. Python NLP-ML prediction code and trained tissue models are available at https://github.com/krishnanlab/txt2onto .

Indexed as

MetadataNatural Language ProcessingGenomicsHumansLanguageMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID36347858
PMCPMC9643451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.