ArticleNature communications2022
Systematic tissue annotations of genomics samples by modeling unstructured metadata.
Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using semantic search to find publicly available gene-expression datasets.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- MCPmed: a call for Model Context Protocol-enabled bioinformatics web services for LLM-driven discovery.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Repurposing the memory-promoting meclofenoxate hydrochloride as a treatment for Parkinson's disease through integrative multi-omics analysis.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2025Article
- Perceptual and technical barriers in sharing and formatting metadata accompanying omics studies.Cell genomics · 2025Review
- A keyword-based approach to analyzing scientific research trends: ReRAM present and future.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Annotating publicly-available samples and studies using interpretable modeling of unstructured metadata.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- BioVDB: biological vector database for high-throughput gene expression meta-analysis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Projecting genetic associations through gene expression patterns highlights disease etiology and drug mechanisms.Nature communications · 2023Article
- SMetaS: A Sample Metadata Standardizer for Metabolomics.Metabolites · 2023Article
- Systematic tissue annotations of genomics samples by modeling unstructured metadata.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Single-cell network biology characterizes cell type gene regulation for drug repurposing and phenotype prediction in Alzheimer's disease.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are currently >1.3 million human -omics samples that are publicly available. This valuable resource remains acutely underused because discovering particular samples from this ever-growing data collection remains a significant challenge. The major impediment is that sample attributes are routinely described using varied terminologies written in unstructured natural language. We propose a natural-language-processing-based machine learning approach (NLP-ML) to infer tissue and cell-type annotations for genomics samples based only on their free-text metadata. NLP-ML works by creating numerical representations of sample descriptions and using these representations as features in a supervised learning classifier that predicts tissue/cell-type terms. Our approach significantly outperforms an advanced graph-based reasoning annotation method (MetaSRA) and a baseline exact string matching method (TAGGER). Model similarities between related tissues demonstrate that NLP-ML models capture biologically-meaningful signals in text. Additionally, these models correctly classify tissue-associated biological processes and diseases based on their text descriptions alone. NLP-ML models are nearly as accurate as models based on gene-expression profiles in predicting sample tissue annotations but have the distinct capability to classify samples irrespective of the genomics experiment type based on their text metadata. Python NLP-ML prediction code and trained tissue models are available at https://github.com/krishnanlab/txt2onto .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.