ArticleCMAJ open
Continuity of physician care over the last year of life for different cause-of-death categories: a retrospective population-based study.
Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association Between Team-Based Continuity of Care Measures and End-of-Life Health Care Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Ontario, Canada.Medical care · 2026Article
- Article
- Continuity and discontinuity of end-of-life care: A grounded theory study of bereaved family caregivers' experiences.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Continuity of Care and Risks of Hospitalization and Mortality in COPD: A Nationwide Cohort Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Laboratory Test Use and Values in the Last Year of Life-a Matched Cohort Design.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2025Article
- Article
- Developing and testing scales for home support service continuity (HSSC): cross-sectional studies in Canada and UK.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe mix of care provided by family physicians, specialists and palliative care physicians can vary by the illnesses leading to death, which may result in disruptions of continuity of care at the end of life. We measured continuity of outpatient physician care in the last year of life across differing causes of death and assessed factors associated with higher continuity.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective descriptive study of adults who died in Ontario between 2013 and 2018, using linked provincial health administrative data. We calculated 3 measures of continuity (usual provider, Bice-Boxerman and sequential continuity), which range from 0 to 1, from outpatient physician visits over the last year of life for terminal illness, organ failure, frailty, sudden death and other causes of death. We used multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate associations between characteristics and a continuity score of 0.5 or greater.
resultsAmong the 417 628 decedents, we found that mean usual provider, Bice-Boxerman and sequential continuity indices were 0.37, 0.30 and 0.37, respectively, with continuity being the lowest for those with terminal illness (0.27, 0.23 and 0.33, respectively). Higher number of comorbidities, higher neighbourhood income quintile and all non-sudden death categories were associated with lower continuity.
interpretationWe found that continuity of physician care in the last year of life was low, especially in those with cancer. Further research is needed to validate measures of continuity against end-of-life health care outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.