Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36347552›Full record

ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2022

The Prostate Health Index and multi-parametric MRI improve diagnostic accuracy of detecting prostate cancer in Asian populations.

Changhee Ye, Jin-Nyoung Ho, Dan Hyo Kim, Sang Hun Song, Hwanik Kim, Hakmin Lee, Seong Jin Jeong, Sung Kyu Hong, Seok-Soo Byun, Hyungwoo Ahn and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment in Prostate Cancer.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Changhee YeDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2328-8436
Jin-Nyoung HoDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3224-5347
Dan Hyo KimDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6938-807X
Sang Hun SongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3016-0032
Hwanik KimDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5201-2490
Hakmin LeeDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1247-9958
Seong Jin JeongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3580-1452
Sung Kyu HongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8344-6774
Seok-Soo ByunDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9356-9500
Hyungwoo AhnDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3266-6176
Sung Il HwangDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7516-5369
Hak Jong LeeDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0858-7873
Sangchul LeeDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0844-6843
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KR

Funding

Korea Medical Device Development Fund 1711138269Korea Medical Device Development Fund KMDF_PR_20200901_0141National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2020R1F1A1072702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) and prostate multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in predicting prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) during initial prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn total, 343 patients underwent initial prostate biopsy and were screened by use of PHI and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels between April 2019 and July 2021. A subgroup of 232 patients also underwent prostate mpMRI. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the accuracies of PSA, PHI, and mpMRI as predictors of PCa or csPCa. These predictive accuracies were quantified by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The different predictive models were compared using the DeLong test.

resultsLogistic regression showed that age, PSA, PHI, and prostate volume were significant predictors of both PCa and csPCa. In the mpMRI subgroup, age, PSA level, PHI, prostate volume, and mpMRI were predictors of both PCa and csPCa. The PHI (area under the curve [AUC]=0.693) was superior to the PSA level (AUC=0.615) as a predictor of PCa (p=0.038). Combining PHI and mpMRI showed the most accurate prediction of both PCa and csPCa (AUC=0.833, 0.881, respectively).

conclusionsThe most accurate prediction of both PCa and csPCa can be performed by combining PHI and mpMRI. In the absence of mpMRI, PHI is superior to PSA alone as a predictor of PCa, and adding PHI to PSA can increase the detection rate of both PCa and csPCa.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific AntigenMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingProstate cancerProstate Health Index

Identifiers

PMID36347552
PMCPMC9643725
OpenAlexW4308682137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.