ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023
Quantify total activity by volume-of-interest expansion with clinical SPECT/CT systems, a phantom study.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantify total activity by volume-of-interest expansion with clinical SPECT/CT systems, a phantom study.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeQuantitative measurements of activity in SPECT are important for radioisotope therapy planning and disease diagnosis. The aim of this manuscript is to develop a robust method to quantify the total activity in a volume-of-interest (VOI) of different quantitative SPECT reconstructions and validate the estimation accuracy.
methodsWe customized an IEC body phantom using 3D printing technology and made six sphere inserts of 1-6 cm in diameter with at least 3 cm separation. The activity concentration within the spheres was in the range of patient lesion/organ activity. The background activity was then increased from zero to a sphere/background activity concentration of 8:1, 4:1, and 2:1. SPECT data were acquired with Philips Brightview and GE Discovery 670 SPECT/computed tomography (CT) systems under clinical acquisition protocols. Quantitative SPECT images were reconstructed with Hermes SUV-SPECT (both Philips and GE data) and GE Q.Metrix (GE data only). The quantitative SPECT reconstructions are iterative with scatter, CT attenuation correction, and resolution recovery. We quantified the total activity by expanding the sphere VOI to include a spill-out region. Background correction was applied by sampling a region outside the spill-out region. The true fractions (TFs) (total activity/true activity) were measured for all six spheres for all SPECT acquisitions.
resultsThe TF is close to 100% for 2-6 cm spheres for zero background, 8:1 and 4:1 sphere/background activity ratios. The TF was found to be unreliable for the 1-cm sphere because of the limit of phantom design. TF accuracy for 2:1 sphere/background ratio was degraded due to significantly large background, inadequate scatter correction and detector count loss.
conclusionsThe results demonstrated that the proposed quantification method is accurate for objects of different sizes in currently clinical quantitative reconstruction and has the potential for improving the accuracy for therapeutic treatment planning or radiation dosimetry calculations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.