Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36346817›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Caring for Carers (C4C): Results from a feasibility randomised controlled trial of positive written disclosure for older adult carers of people with psychosis.

Christina J Jones, Cassie M Hazell, Mark Hayward, Aparajita Pandey, Alexandra Papamichail, Stephen A Bremner, Daryl B O'Connor, Vanessa Pinfold, Helen E Smith

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina J JonesSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health & Medical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Cassie M HazellDepartment of Primary Care & Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Mark HaywardSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Research and Development Department, Sussex Education Centre, Hove, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6567-7723
Aparajita PandeySussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Research and Development Department, Sussex Education Centre, Hove, United Kingdom.
Alexandra PapamichailSection of Women's Mental Health, Department of Health Service and Population Research, IoPPN, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Stephen A BremnerDepartment of Primary Care & Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Daryl B O'ConnorSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Vanessa PinfoldThe McPin Foundation, London, United Kingdom.
Helen E SmithFamily Medicine and Primary Care, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Brighton and Sussex Medical School · GBKing's College London · GBMcPin Foundation · GBNanyang Technological University · SGSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Surrey · GBUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adult carers of people who experience psychosis are at increased risk of developing physical and mental health problems due to the compounding factors of supporting their care-recipient and the health changes associated with ageing. Effective interventions exist but can be difficult to access and maintain prolonged engagement. Self-directed writing therapies, frequently referred to as Written Emotional Disclosure (WED), might be a suitable alternative intervention to improve the wellbeing of carers.

methodsThis study aimed to determine the feasibility (recruitment, retention and primary outcome completion) and acceptability of a specific WED intervention known as Positive Written Disclosure (PWD). Informal carers of people with psychosis were randomised to PWD, neutral writing or no writing. Quantitative outcomes including positive and negative affect, carer wellbeing, quality of life, depression, anxiety, stress, self-efficacy, leisure time satisfaction as well as health care utilisation were collected at baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month assessments. Qualitative feedback was also collected via questionnaire and semi-structured interviews from those randomised to either writing group.

resultsWe successfully met our progression criteria, recruiting to target and within timeframes whilst attaining 97% retention and 84% primary outcome data completed at 6 months. Carers randomised to the positive writing group described the intervention as enabling them to have a more positive attitude and focus on activities for themselves. Both writing groups described their tasks as providing distraction from caring responsibilities. However, some carers found the narrow positive emotion focus challenging.

conclusionsPWD is a feasible and acceptable intervention for older adult carers of people with psychosis within a community setting. Further refinement of the writing protocol to include choice in type of emotion disclosed in addition to screening for some level of need may be required in future trials to reduce floor/ceiling effects of outcomes which may explain the lack of change observed.

Indexed as

CaregiversPsychotic DisordersAgedDisclosureFeasibility StudiesHumansQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID36346817
PMCPMC9642897
OpenAlexW4308574737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.