Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36346656›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2022

Quality of Mobile Apps for Child Development Support: Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.

Akeiylah DeWitt, Julie Kientz, Kendra Liljenquist

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akeiylah DeWittDepartment of Human-Centered Design and Engineering, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4534-7273
Julie KientzDepartment of Human-Centered Design and Engineering, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7437-7861
Kendra LiljenquistDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0618-2506
University of Washington · US

Funding

AHRQ HHS K12 HS026369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing increases in smartphone access, more parents seek parenting advice through internet sources, including blogs, web-based forums, or mobile apps. However, identifying quality apps (ones that respond to the diverse experiences of families) for guidance on child development can be challenging.

objectiveThis review of mobile health apps aimed to document the landscape, design, and content of apps in the United States available to parents as they promote their child's developmental health.

methodsTo understand the availability and quality of apps for early childhood health promotion, we completed a content analysis of apps in 2 major app stores (Google Play and Apple App stores).

resultsWe found that most apps do not provide tailored experiences to parents, including cultural considerations, and instead promote generic guidance that may be useful to parents in some contexts. We discuss the need for an evaluative framework to assess apps aimed to support parents on child development topics.

conclusionsFuture work is needed on how to support designers in this area, specifically related to avoiding potential burdens on users and providing culturally informed and equity-driven experiences.

Indexed as

child developmentearly childhood health promotionmHealthmobile appmobile healthmobile health technologiesmobile phoneparentingparent support technologiespediatrics

Identifiers

PMID36346656
PMCPMC9682452
OpenAlexW4296173841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.