Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36346595›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

B-Cell Epitope Predictions Using Computational Methods.

Dandan Zheng, Shide Liang, Chi Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Design of B-Cell Multi-Epitope Subunit Vaccines AgainstTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. B-EPIC: A Transformer-Based Language Model for Decoding B Cell Immunodominance Patterns.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Deep learning of antibody epitopes using positional permutation vectors.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  15. Computational prediction of multiple antigen epitopes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Design of aFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dandan ZhengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Shide LiangDepartment of Research and Development, Bio-Thera Solutions, Guangzhou, China. shideliang@hotmail.com.
Chi ZhangSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA. czhang5@unl.edu.
Ta Solutions (China) · CNUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying protein antigenic epitopes that are recognizable by antibodies is a key step in immunologic research. This type of research has broad medical applications, such as new immunodiagnostic reagent discovery, vaccine design, and antibody design. However, due to the countless possibilities of potential epitopes, the experimental search through trial and error would be too costly and time-consuming to be practical. To facilitate this process and improve its efficiency, computational methods were developed to predict both linear epitopes and discontinuous antigenic epitopes. For linear B-cell epitope prediction, many methods were developed, including PREDITOP, PEOPLE, BEPITOPE, BepiPred, COBEpro, ABCpred, AAP, BCPred, BayesB, BEOracle/BROracle, BEST, LBEEP, DRREP, iBCE-EL, SVMTriP, etc. For the more challenging yet important task of discontinuous epitope prediction, methods were also developed, including CEP, DiscoTope, PEPITO, ElliPro, SEPPA, EPITOPIA, PEASE, EpiPred, SEPIa, EPCES, EPSVR, etc. In this chapter, we will discuss computational methods for B-cell epitope predictions of both linear and discontinuous epitopes. SVMTriP and EPCES/EPCSVR, the most successful among the methods for each type of the predictions, will be used as model methods to detail the standard protocols. For linear epitope prediction, SVMTriP was reported to achieve a sensitivity of 80.1% and a precision of 55.2% with a fivefold cross-validation based on a large dataset, yielding an AUC of 0.702. For discontinuous or conformational B-cell epitope prediction, EPCES and EPCSVR were both benchmarked by a curated independent test dataset in which all antigens had no complex structures with the antibody. The identified epitopes by these methods were later independently validated by various biochemical experiments. For these three model methods, webservers and all datasets are publicly available at http://sysbio.unl.edu/SVMTriP , http://sysbio.unl.edu/EPCES/ , and http://sysbio.unl.edu/EPSVR/ .

Indexed as

AntigensEpitopes, B-LymphocyteComputational BiologyEpitope MappingHumansAntigensEpitopes, B-LymphocyteB-cell epitope predictionSupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID36346595
OpenAlexW4308583755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.