Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36346593›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

In Silico Prediction Method for Protein Asparagine Deamidation.

Lei Jia, Yaxiong Sun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lei JiaAmgen Research, One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. leijia@nyu.edu.
Yaxiong SunAmgen Research, One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Amgen (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In silico prediction methods were developed to predict protein asparagine (Asn) deamidation. The method is based on understanding deamidation mechanism on structural level with machine learning. Our structure-based method is more accurate than the sequence-based method which is still widely used in protein engineering process. In addition, molecular dynamics simulation was applied to study the time occupancy of nucleophilic attack distance, which is hypothesized as the most important step toward the rate-limiting succinimide intermediate formation. A more accurate prediction method for distinguishing potentially liable amino acid residues would allow their elimination or reduction as early as possible in the drug discovery process. It is possible that such quantitative protein structure-property relationship tools can also be applied to other protein hotspot predictions.

Indexed as

AsparagineProteinsAmidesAmidesAsparagineProteinsFeature selectionHotspotMachine learningMolecular dynamicsPredictionProtein deamidationProtein engineeringStructure

Identifiers

PMID36346593
OpenAlexW4308583725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.