Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36346586›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Computational Modeling of Antibody and T-Cell Receptor (CDR3 Loops).

Frederikke I Marin, Paolo Marcatili

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frederikke I MarinDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Paolo MarcatiliDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark. pamar@dtu.dk.
Technical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibodies and T-cell receptors have been a subject of much interest due to their central role in the immune system and their potential applications in several biotechnological and medical applications from cancer therapy to vaccine development. A unique feature of these two lymphocyte receptors is their ability to bind a huge variety of different (pathogen) targets. This ability stems from six short loops in the binding domain that have hypervariable sequence due to genetic recombination mechanism. Particularly one of these loops, the third complementarity determining region (CDR3), has the highest sequence variability and a dominant role in binding the target. However, it has also been proven the most difficult to be modeled structurally, which is vitally important for downstream tasks such as binding prediction. This difficulty stems from its variability in sequence that both reduces the possibility of finding homologues and introduces unique structural features in the loop. We present here a general protocol for modeling such loops in antibodies and T-cell receptors. We also discuss the difficulties in loop modeling and the advantages and limitations of different modeling methods.

Indexed as

Complementarity Determining RegionsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellAntibodiesComputer SimulationReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaAntibodiesComplementarity Determining RegionsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaAntibody modelingCDR3 modelingComputational designDeepH3FREADH3LoopredLYRAPIGSRepetoire BuilderSphinxTCRBuilderTCRmodelTCR modeling

Identifiers

PMID36346586
OpenAlexW4308583741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.