Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36346479›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2023

The pleasantness and unpleasantness of an object distinctively drives its grasping prediction: behavioral evidence.

Ghislain Saunier, Priscila da Silva Azevedo, Vitoria Labiapari Pinto, Anaelli Aparecida Nogueira-Campos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ghislain SaunierLaboratório de Cognição Motora, Universidade Federal do Pará, Rua Augusto Corrêa 01, Belém, PA, CEP: 66075-110, Brasil. ghislain@ufpa.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0882-7788
Priscila da Silva AzevedoLaboratório de Cognição Motora, Universidade Federal do Pará, Rua Augusto Corrêa 01, Belém, PA, CEP: 66075-110, Brasil.
Vitoria Labiapari PintoLaboratório de Neurofisiologia Cognitiva (LabNeuro), Departamento de Fisiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil.
Anaelli Aparecida Nogueira-CamposLaboratório de Neurofisiologia Cognitiva (LabNeuro), Departamento de Fisiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 426861/ 2016-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Action and perception share a common sensorimotor network permitting a functional action-perception coupling. This coupling would permit to predict the outcome of others' actions. Moreover, recent findings suggest that action-perception linkage could be sensitive to emotional content of the visual scene. The present study sought to address how emotion inherent to an object (pleasantness and unpleasantness) affects action prediction processing. To this end, we compared the participants' temporal estimative of the hand contact with emotional objects in occlusion and full vision conditions. We found that the emotion strongly interfered in the prediction of its grasping. Indeed, the participants highly anticipated the touch instant for unpleasant valence compared to pleasant and neutral ones. Moreover, the visual conditions (i.e., occlusion and full vision) affect the magnitude of the predictive error except to unpleasant object. Accordingly, the present results unveil that pleasantness and unpleasantness of an object distinctively drive the prediction of its touch instant.

Indexed as

Hand StrengthPleasurePsychomotor PerformanceTouchTouch PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdolescentAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleForecastingHumansMaleWristYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.