Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36346118›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2023

Impact of time between faecal immunochemical tests in colorectal cancer screening on screening results: A natural experiment.

Sara G Ribe, Edoardo Botteri, Magnus Løberg, Kristin R Randel, Mette Kalager, Jens Aksel Nilsen, Elisabeth H Gulichsen, Øyvind Holme

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sara G RibeSection for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1759-2877
Edoardo BotteriSection for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Magnus LøbergClinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute for Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kristin R RandelSection for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Mette KalagerClinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute for Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Jens Aksel NilsenDepartment of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Baerum, Norway.
Elisabeth H GulichsenDepartment of Medicine, Østfold Hospital, Moss, Norway.
Øyvind HolmeSection for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOCancer Registry of Norway · NOØstfold Hospital Trust · NOVestre Viken Hospital Trust · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repeated rounds of faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for occult blood is a common method for screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the time interval between FIT rounds is not thoroughly investigated. In a CRC screening trial in South-Eastern Norway, individuals were invited for biennial FIT between 2012 and 2019. The positivity threshold was >15 mcg haemoglobin/g faeces (mcg/g). Due to organizational challenges, the interval between screening rounds randomly varied between 1.5 and 3.5 years, forming a natural experiment. We investigated the detection rate of CRC and advanced neoplasia (AN: CRC or advanced adenoma) at the subsequent round (FIT

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsOccult BloodColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerFecesHemoglobinsHumansMass ScreeningOdds RatioHemoglobinscolorectal cancercolorectal cancer screeningfaecal haemoglobin concentrationfaecal immunochemical testFIT

Identifiers

PMID36346118
PMCPMC10098820
OpenAlexW4308553834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.