Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36345829›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine journal2022

Research trends in Australia and New Zealand Nephrology: basic science and gender equity in peril.

Megan R Purvis, Harry Robertson, Ellis Patrick, Natasha M Rogers

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Megan R PurvisSchool of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Harry RobertsonKidney Injury Group, Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ellis PatrickSchool of Mathematics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Natasha M RogersKidney Injury Group, Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2456-9544

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basic science research remains fundamental to progress in clinical care, understanding of disease pathophysiology and underpinning the evolution of personalised medicine. Exposure to research is pivotal to educating students, but a declining profile of basic science research has the potential to erode research capacity further. The capacity for women to engage in research and remain in academia long term is continually challenged by negative gender-based experiences and institutional barriers. The authors explored themes and authorship of abstracts presented at Australia and New Zealand--based nephrology conferences, as a surrogate marker of trends in research activity and gender engagement. Basic science research and female senior authorship declined during the study period, which has serious implications for the future of nephrology.

Indexed as

Gender EquityNephrologyAustraliaFemaleHumansNew ZealandResearchcliniciansgender equitymedical educationresearch

Identifiers

PMID36345829
PMCPMC9827932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.