Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36345645›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2025

Fast-tracking bespoke DNA reference database generation from museum collections for biomonitoring and conservation.

Andrew Dopheide, Talia Brav-Cubitt, Anastasija Podolyan, Richard A B Leschen, Darren Ward, Thomas R Buckley, Manpreet K Dhami

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prospects for Complete DNA Barcode Coverage of the New Zealand Insect Fauna.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew DopheideManaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1554-9832
Talia Brav-CubittManaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3735-530X
Anastasija PodolyanManaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8332-2683
Richard A B LeschenManaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8549-8933
Darren WardManaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4509-8553
Thomas R BuckleyManaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3076-4234
Manpreet K DhamiManaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8956-0674
Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research · NZUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

Better Border Biosecurity Science CollaborationMinistry of Business, Innovation and Employment D17.22Strategic Science Investment Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent advances in high-throughput DNA sequencing technologies, a lack of locally relevant DNA reference databases limits the potential for DNA-based monitoring of biodiversity for conservation and biosecurity applications. Museums and national collections represent a compelling source of authoritatively identified genetic material for DNA database development, yet obtaining DNA barcodes from long-stored specimens may be difficult due to sample degradation. Here we demonstrate a sensitive and efficient laboratory and bioinformatic process for generating DNA barcodes from hundreds of invertebrate specimens simultaneously via the Illumina MiSeq system. Using this process, we recovered full-length (334) or partial (105) COI barcodes from 439 of 450 (98%) national collection-held invertebrate specimens. This included full-length barcodes from 146 specimens which produced low-yield DNA and no visible PCR bands, and which produced as little as a single sequence per specimen, demonstrating high sensitivity of the process. In many cases, the identity of the most abundant sequences per specimen were not the correct barcodes, necessitating the development of a taxonomy-informed process for identifying correct sequences among the sequencing output. The recovery of only partial barcodes for some taxa indicates a need to refine certain PCR primers. Nonetheless, our approach represents a highly sensitive, accurate and efficient method for targeted reference database generation, providing a foundation for DNA-based assessments and monitoring of biodiversity.

Indexed as

Biological MonitoringConservation of Natural ResourcesDatabases, Nucleic AcidDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicInvertebratesAnimalsBiodiversityComputational BiologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMuseumsSequence Analysis, DNAconservationDNA‐based monitoringinvertebrate barcodingmolecular taxonomymuseum collectiontaxonomy‐informed bioinformatics pipeline

Identifiers

PMID36345645
PMCPMC12142715
OpenAlexW4308555013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.