Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36345483›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Unified methods in collecting, preserving, and archiving coral bleaching and restoration specimens to increase sample utility and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Rebecca Vega Thurber, Emily R Schmeltzer, Andréa G Grottoli, Robert van Woesik, Robert J Toonen, Mark Warner, Kerri L Dobson, Rowan H McLachlan, Katie Barott, Daniel J Barshis and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Rebecca Vega ThurberDepartment of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States.
Emily R SchmeltzerDepartment of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5390-4308
Andréa G GrottoliSchool of Earth Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6053-9452
Robert van WoesikInstitute for Global Ecology, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Fl, United States.
Robert J ToonenHawai'i Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Kāne'ohe, HI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6339-4340
Mark WarnerSchool of Marine Science and Policy, University of Delaware, Lewes, DE, United States.
Kerri L DobsonSchool of Earth Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1363-4195
Rowan H McLachlanDepartment of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7222-8210
Katie BarottDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Daniel J BarshisDepartment of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1510-8375
Justin BaumannBiology Department, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0113-0491
Leila ChapronSchool of Earth Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
David J ComboschMarine Laboratory, University of Guam, Mangilao, Guam.ORCID 0000-0001-7004-7435
Adrienne Ms CorreaBioSciences Department, Rice University, Houstan, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0137-5042
Thomas M DeCarloCollege of Natural and Computational Sciences, Hawai'i Pacific University, Honolulu, HI, United States.
Mary HagedornHawai'i Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Kāne'ohe, HI, United States.
Laetitia HédouinCentre de Recherches Insulaires et Observatoire de l'Environnement, Chargée de Recherches CNRS, Papetō'ai, Moorea, French Polynesia.
Kenneth HoadleyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama - Tuscaloosa, Tuscaloosa, AL, United States.
Thomas FelisMARUM - Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1417-9657
Christine Ferrier-PagèsMarine Biology Department, Coral Ecophysiology team, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco.
Carly KenkelDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1126-4311
Ilsa B KuffnerU.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg, FL, United States.
Jennifer MatthewsClimate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2766-8671
Mónica MedinaDepartment of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Christopher MeyerDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian, Washington DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2501-7952
Corinna OsterMARUM - Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
James PriceSchool of Earth Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Hollie M PutnamDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2322-3269
Yvonne SawallBermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences, St. George's, St. George's, Bermuda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coral reefs are declining worldwide primarily because of bleaching and subsequent mortality resulting from thermal stress. Currently, extensive efforts to engage in more holistic research and restoration endeavors have considerably expanded the techniques applied to examine coral samples. Despite such advances, coral bleaching and restoration studies are often conducted within a specific disciplinary focus, where specimens are collected, preserved, and archived in ways that are not always conducive to further downstream analyses by specialists in other disciplines. This approach may prevent the full utilization of unexpended specimens, leading to siloed research, duplicative efforts, unnecessary loss of additional corals to research endeavors, and overall increased costs. A recent US National Science Foundation-sponsored workshop set out to consolidate our collective knowledge across the disciplines of Omics, Physiology, and Microscopy and Imaging regarding the methods used for coral sample collection, preservation, and archiving. Here, we highlight knowledge gaps and propose some simple steps for collecting, preserving, and archiving coral-bleaching specimens that can increase the impact of individual coral bleaching and restoration studies, as well as foster additional analyses and future discoveries through collaboration. Rapid freezing of samples in liquid nitrogen or placing at -80 °C to -20 °C is optimal for most Omics and Physiology studies with a few exceptions; however, freezing samples removes the potential for many Microscopy and Imaging-based analyses due to the alteration of tissue integrity during freezing. For Microscopy and Imaging, samples are best stored in aldehydes. The use of sterile gloves and receptacles during collection supports the downstream analysis of host-associated bacterial and viral communities which are particularly germane to disease and restoration efforts. Across all disciplines, the use of aseptic techniques during collection, preservation, and archiving maximizes the research potential of coral specimens and allows for the greatest number of possible downstream analyses.

Indexed as

AnthozoaCoral BleachingAnimalsCoral ReefsAnalyticsCoralMethodologyOmicsPhysiologyPipelinesProtocolsProvenanceReefStorage

Identifiers

PMID36345483
PMCPMC9636870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.