Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36345481›Full record

ReviewPeerJ2022

Elasmobranch-associated microbiota: a scientometric literature review.

Ivana Correia Costa, Mariene Amorim de Oliveira, Natascha Wosnick, Rachel Ann Hauser-Davis, Salvatore Siciliano, Jorge Luiz Silva Nunes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ivana Correia CostaLaboratório de Organismos Aquáticos, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Mariene Amorim de OliveiraLaboratório de Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Natascha WosnickDepartamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Rachel Ann Hauser-DavisLaboratório de Avaliação e Promoção da Saúde Ambiental, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9451-471X
Salvatore SicilianoDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0124-8070
Jorge Luiz Silva NunesLaboratório de Organismos Aquáticos, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elasmobranchs provide greatly relevant ecosystem services for the balance of the environments in which they are inserted. In recent decades, sharp population declines have been reported for many species in different regions worldwide, making this taxonomic group currently one of the most threatened with extinction. This scenario is almost entirely due to excessive fishing pressure, but any contributing factor that may cause additional mortality to populations must be mapped and monitored. In a fast-changing world, emerging marine pollution associated with climate change display the potential to increase the spread of infectious agents. These can, in turn, lead to mortality events, both directly and indirectly, by reducing immune responses and the physical and nutritional condition of affected individuals. In this context, the present study aimed to analyze data concerning elasmobranch-associated microbiota, identifying study trends and knowledge gaps in order to direct future studies on this topic of growing relevance for the health of wild populations, as well as individuals maintained in captivity, considering the zoonotic potential of these microorganisms.

Indexed as

EcosystemElasmobranchiiMicrobiotaAnimalsClimate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesBacteriaBatoidsFungiSharks

Identifiers

PMID36345481
PMCPMC9636872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.