ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2022
Production and Provision of Context-Based Patient-Specific Educational Resources.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards knee osteoarthritis: a regional study in Chinese patients.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Impact of encounters on patient app use: results of a tethered mobile personal health record usage pattern analysis.BMC health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient education is generally accompanied by instructive materials. The Korean government has recommended the provision of patient-specific educational materials (PEMs) via an electronic medical record (EMR) certification system. However, there are currently no clear standards or guidelines for including PEMs in current domestic educational materials. We investigated the benefits of integrating PEMs with the EMR certification system and the methods by which this integration can be achieved.
methodsWe developed and administered three structured Delphi surveys to 26 healthcare providers in clinical settings based on data collected from separate semi-structured advisory interviews with five experts. The surveys included the following topics: 1) expected effects of patient-specific education and health-related notifications/alarms, 2) desirable methods for providing PEMs, and 3) appropriate fee-setting and government support. We distributed the Delphi surveys via e-mail and calculated the average and standard deviation of the survey responses.
resultsPEMs are expected to have significant educational effects, such as the provision of surgery/intervention-related information, and will improve the understanding of various treatment processes/procedures. The preferred method for providing PEMs was via automatic request after receiving confirmation from healthcare providers. The provision of these materials was based on set fees and government support. The average fee per session was set at approximately USD 23 (as of October 2021, USD 1 = KRW 1,196).
conclusionIn this study, we investigated the prerequisites, contents, methods, and fees related to the provision of effective and efficient PEMs. The study findings can facilitate the production and provision of PEMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.