Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36345236›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2023

Value of machine learning algorithms for predicting diabetes risk: A subset analysis from a real-world retrospective cohort study.

Yaqian Mao, Zheng Zhu, Shuyao Pan, Wei Lin, Jixing Liang, Huibin Huang, Liantao Li, Junping Wen, Gang Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yaqian Mao *Department of Internal Medicine, Fujian Provincial Hospital South Branch, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1836-7834
Zheng Zhu *Department of Endocrinology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-1947
Shuyao Pan *Department of Endocrinology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Wei LinDepartment of Endocrinology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0455-8752
Jixing LiangDepartment of Endocrinology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Huibin HuangDepartment of Endocrinology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Liantao LiDepartment of Endocrinology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Junping WenDepartment of Endocrinology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5650-5281
Gang ChenDepartment of Endocrinology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8105-2384

Funding

Chinese Medical Association Foundation and Chinese Endocrine Society 12020240314National Natural Science Foundation of China 81270874Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2011J06012Startup Fund for scientific research, Fujian Medical University 2020QH2049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS/

introductionTo compare the application value of different machine learning (ML) algorithms for diabetes risk prediction. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a 3-year retrospective cohort study with a total of 3,687 participants being included in the data analysis. Modeling variable screening and predictive model building were carried out using logistic regression (LR) analysis and 10-fold cross-validation, respectively. In total, six different ML algorithms, including random forests, light gradient boosting machine, extreme gradient boosting, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), multi-layer perceptrons and gaussian naive bayes were used for model construction. Model performance was mainly evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The best performing ML model was selected for comparison with the traditional LR model and visualized using Shapley additive explanations.

resultsA total of eight risk factors most associated with the development of diabetes were identified by univariate and multivariate LR analysis, and they were visualized in the form of a nomogram. Among the six different ML models, the random forests model had the best predictive performance. After 10-fold cross-validation, its optimal model has an area under the receiver operating characteristic value of 0.855 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.823-0.886) in the training set and 0.835 (95% CI 0.779-0.892) in the test set. In the traditional LR model, its area under the receiver operating characteristic value is 0.840 (95% CI 0.814-0.866) in the training set and 0.834 (95% CI 0.785-0.884) in the test set.

conclusionsIn the real-world epidemiological research, the combination of traditional variable screening and ML algorithm to construct a diabetes risk prediction model has satisfactory clinical application value.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiabetes MellitusBayes TheoremHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsDiabetesMachine learning algorithmsPredictive model

Identifiers

PMID36345236
PMCPMC9889616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.