Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36345050›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced nursing2023

An integrative review exploring the impact of Electronic Health Records (EHR) on the quality of nurse-patient interactions and communication.

Carol Forde-Johnston, Dan Butcher, Helen Aveyard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carol Forde-JohnstonSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7266-5755
Dan ButcherSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6151-7738
Helen AveyardSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5133-3356

Funding

Programme Grants for Applied Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore how nurses' use of electronic health records impacts on the quality of nurse-patient interactions and communication.

designAn integrative review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE®, CINAHL®, PscyINFO, PubMed, BNI and Cochrane Library databases were searched for papers published between January 2005 and April 2022. REVIEW

methodsFollowing a comprehensive search, the studies were appraised using a tool appropriate to the study design. Data were extracted from the studies that met the inclusion criteria relating to sample characteristics, methods and the strength of evidence. Included empirical studies had to examine interactions or communication between a nurse and patient while electronic health records were being used in any healthcare setting. Findings were synthesized using a thematic approach.

resultsOne thousand nine hundred and twenty articles were initially identified but only eight met the inclusion criteria of this review. Thematic analysis revealed four key themes, indicating that EHR: impedes on face-to-face communication, promotes task-orientated and formulaic communication and impacts on types of communication patterns.

conclusionResearch examining nurse-patient interactions and communication when nurses' use electronic health records is limited but evidence suggests that closed nurse-patient communications, reflecting a task-driven approach, were predominantly used when nurses used electronic health records, although some nurses were able to overcome logistical barriers and communicate more openly. Nurses' use of electronic health records impacts on the flow, nature and quality of communication between a nurse and patient. IMPACT: The move to electronic health records has taken place largely without consideration of the impact that this might have on nurse-patient interaction and communication. There is evidence of impact but also evidence of how this might be mitigated. Nurses must focus future research on examining the impact that these systems have, and to develop strategies and practice that continue to promote the importance of nurse-patient interactions and communication. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Studies examined within this review included patient participants that informed the analysis and interpretation of data.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNurse-Patient RelationsCommunicationHumanselectronic health recordhealth information technologyintegrative reviewnurse-patient interactionspatient communicationperson-centred care

Identifiers

PMID36345050
PMCPMC10100205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.