Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36345047›Full record

ArticleMilitary Medical Research2022

Alterations in the human oral microbiome in cholangiocarcinoma.

Ben-Chen Rao, Gui-Zhen Zhang, Ya-Wen Zou, Tong Ren, Hong-Yan Ren, Chao Liu, Zu-Jiang Yu, Zhi-Gang Ren

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Military Medical Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Oral and Pancreatobiliary Microbiota in Cancer: A Systematic Review of Compositional Alterations and Their Clinical Implications.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Microbial dysbiosis in cholangiocarcinoma.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Recent progress in carbon dots for anti-pathogen applications in oral cavity.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ben-Chen RaoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Gui-Zhen ZhangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Ya-Wen ZouDepartment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Tong RenDepartment of Pharmacy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Hong-Yan RenShanghai Mobio Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201111, China.
Chao LiuShanghai Mobio Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201111, China.
Zu-Jiang YuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China. johnyuem@zzu.edu.cn.
Zhi-Gang RenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China. fccrenzg@zzu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-0798-3444

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaMicrobiotaBacteriaBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHumans16S rRNA MiSeq sequencingCholangiocarcinomaDiagnostic biomarkerOral microbiomeRandom forest model

Identifiers

PMID36345047
PMCPMC9641929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.