ArticleBMC biology2022
Attractive and repulsive effects of sensory history concurrently shape visual perception.
Article in BMC biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Altered Neural Activity in Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder With Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: A Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Meta-Analysis.Neural plasticity · 2025Pooled it
- Serial dependence in time perception requires consistent motor responses, not shared memory alone.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026Article
- Serial dependence does not build up to central tendency bias in orientation judgments.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Serial dependence during visuomotor integration is robust to the passage of time and interference from intervening tasks.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Time, space and feature similarity determine attractive and repulsive serial biases in trustworthiness impressions.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Motion direction biases around the clock: Learned and in-built direction priors pull perception and pursuit apart.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Large-scale mega-analysis indicates that serial dependence deteriorates perceptual decision-making.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- Is repulsive serial bias in visual perception driven by adaptation mechanisms?Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Reduced prediction updating shapes serial dependence in autistic traits.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Attractive and repulsive history effects in categorical and continuous estimates of orientation perception.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Process dynamics of serial biases in visual perception and working memory processes.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- Environmental motion presented ahead of self-motion modulates heading direction estimation.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- The across-trial accumulation of cardinal illusion in orientation estimation attenuates the significance of serial dependence.Psychological research · 2025Article
- Belief updating in decision-variable space: More fine-grained choices attract future ones more strongly.iScience · 2025Article
- Vulnerable brain regions in adolescent attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Effects of perceptual and decisional uncertainty on serial dependence in orientation perception.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Serial bias and response time: Prior stimulus not only biases but also modulates the speed of decision for a new stimulus.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Estimation bias and serial dependence in speed perception.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- The distinct development of stimulus and response serial dependence.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSequential effects of environmental stimuli are ubiquitous in most behavioral tasks involving magnitude estimation, memory, decision making, and emotion. The human visual system exploits continuity in the visual environment, which induces two contrasting perceptual phenomena shaping visual perception. Previous work reported that perceptual estimation of a stimulus may be influenced either by attractive serial dependencies or repulsive aftereffects, with a number of experimental variables suggested as factors determining the direction and magnitude of sequential effects. Recent studies have theorized that these two effects concurrently arise in perceptual processing, but empirical evidence that directly supports this hypothesis is lacking, and it remains unclear whether and how attractive and repulsive sequential effects interact in a trial. Here we show that the two effects concurrently modulate estimation behavior in a typical sequence of perceptual tasks.
resultsWe first demonstrate that observers' estimation error as a function of both the previous stimulus and response cannot be fully described by either attractive or repulsive bias but is instead well captured by a summation of repulsion from the previous stimulus and attraction toward the previous response. We then reveal that the repulsive bias is centered on the observer's sensory encoding of the previous stimulus, which is again repelled away from its own preceding trial, whereas the attractive bias is centered precisely on the previous response, which is the observer's best prediction about the incoming stimuli.
conclusionsOur findings provide strong evidence that sensory encoding is shaped by dynamic tuning of the system to the past stimuli, inducing repulsive aftereffects, and followed by inference incorporating the prediction from the past estimation, leading to attractive serial dependence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.