Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36344989›Full record

SynthesisRadiation oncology (London, England)2022

Deep learning in CT image segmentation of cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chongze Yang, Lan-Hui Qin, Yu-En Xie, Jin-Yuan Liao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cervical cancer segmentation based on medical images: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chongze Yang *Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
Lan-Hui Qin *Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
Yu-En XieDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
Jin-Yuan LiaoDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China. liaojinyuan@gxmu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81360220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper attempts to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of deep learning (DLs) models for cervical cancer CT image segmentation.

methodsRelevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of science. The literature on DLs for cervical cancer CT image segmentation were included, a meta-analysis was performed on the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of the segmentation results of the included DLs models. We also did subgroup analyses according to the size of the sample, type of segmentation (i.e., two dimensions and three dimensions), and three organs at risk (i.e., bladder, rectum, and femur). This study was registered in PROSPERO prior to initiation (CRD42022307071).

resultsA total of 1893 articles were retrieved and 14 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled effect of DSC score of clinical target volume (CTV), bladder, rectum, femoral head were 0.86(95%CI 0.84 to 0.87), 0.91(95%CI 0.89 to 0.93), 0.83(95%CI 0.79 to 0.88), and 0.92(95%CI 0.91to 0.94), respectively. For the performance of segmented CTV by two dimensions (2D) and three dimensions (3D) model, the DSC score value for 2D model was 0.87 (95%CI 0.85 to 0.90), while the DSC score for 3D model was 0.85 (95%CI 0.82 to 0.87). As for the effect of the capacity of sample on segmentation performance, no matter whether the sample size is divided into two groups: greater than 100 and less than 100, or greater than 150 and less than 150, the results show no difference (P > 0.05). Four papers reported the time for segmentation from 15 s to 2 min.

conclusionDLs have good accuracy in automatic segmentation of CT images of cervical cancer with a less time consuming and have good prospects for future radiotherapy applications, but still need public high-quality databases and large-scale research verification.

Indexed as

Deep LearningUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPelvisTomography, X-Ray ComputedCervical neoplasmComputed tomographyDeep learningMeta-analysisRadiotherapySegmentation

Identifiers

PMID36344989
PMCPMC9641941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.