SynthesisRadiation oncology (London, England)2022
Deep learning in CT image segmentation of cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical challenges in the adaptation of AI predictive models in radiation oncology for gynaecological cancer: a systematic review by the radiation oncology-AI MITO group.La Radiologia medica · 2026Review
- A novel interpretable machine learning framework integrating clinicopathological and radiomic features for early recurrence prediction in mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Automated segmentation of lymph node metastases in colorectal cancer based on convolutional KAN.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- Radiomics and artificial intelligence in precision radiotherapy for cervical cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Large-scale convolutional neural network for clinical target and multi-organ segmentation in gynecologic brachytherapy via multi-stage learning.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Machine and Deep Learning for the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Cervical Cancer: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Cer-ConvN3Unet: an end-to-end multi-parametric MRI-based pipeline for automated detection and segmentation of cervical cancer.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Cervical cancer segmentation based on medical images: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Review
- A prior-information-based automatic segmentation method for the clinical target volume in adaptive radiotherapy of cervical cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- The Integration of Deep Learning in Radiotherapy: Exploring Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions through an Umbrella Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Automatic gross tumor volume segmentation with failure detection for safe implementation in locally advanced cervical cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Exploring Fracture Patterns: Assessing Representation Methods for Bone Fracture Simulation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Deep learning image segmentation approaches for malignant bone lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in radiology · 2023Review
- Stability and Reproducibility of Radiomic Features Based on Various Segmentation Techniques on Cervical Cancer DWI-MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis paper attempts to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of deep learning (DLs) models for cervical cancer CT image segmentation.
methodsRelevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of science. The literature on DLs for cervical cancer CT image segmentation were included, a meta-analysis was performed on the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of the segmentation results of the included DLs models. We also did subgroup analyses according to the size of the sample, type of segmentation (i.e., two dimensions and three dimensions), and three organs at risk (i.e., bladder, rectum, and femur). This study was registered in PROSPERO prior to initiation (CRD42022307071).
resultsA total of 1893 articles were retrieved and 14 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled effect of DSC score of clinical target volume (CTV), bladder, rectum, femoral head were 0.86(95%CI 0.84 to 0.87), 0.91(95%CI 0.89 to 0.93), 0.83(95%CI 0.79 to 0.88), and 0.92(95%CI 0.91to 0.94), respectively. For the performance of segmented CTV by two dimensions (2D) and three dimensions (3D) model, the DSC score value for 2D model was 0.87 (95%CI 0.85 to 0.90), while the DSC score for 3D model was 0.85 (95%CI 0.82 to 0.87). As for the effect of the capacity of sample on segmentation performance, no matter whether the sample size is divided into two groups: greater than 100 and less than 100, or greater than 150 and less than 150, the results show no difference (P > 0.05). Four papers reported the time for segmentation from 15 s to 2 min.
conclusionDLs have good accuracy in automatic segmentation of CT images of cervical cancer with a less time consuming and have good prospects for future radiotherapy applications, but still need public high-quality databases and large-scale research verification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.