Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36344959›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2022

Prognostic factors in the treatment of gastric mucosal atypical hyperplasia by endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Yongping Hong, Xingxing Chen, Guofeng Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yongping HongDepartment of Anorectal Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Xiaoshan Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, No. 199 South Shixin Road, Hangzhou, 311200, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Xingxing ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou, 311200, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Guofeng LiDepartment of Anorectal Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Xiaoshan Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, No. 199 South Shixin Road, Hangzhou, 311200, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China. guofengli0630@126.com.
Wenzhou Medical University · CNThe First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is becoming increasingly popular as a treatment for precancerous lesions and early cancers of the stomach. However, there have been few studies on the factors associated with the recurrence of precancerous lesions after ESD.

methodsTo investigate the prognostic factors of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia, we retrospectively analyzed 115 patients who were treated with ESD between February 2018 and January 2020. Chi-square test and Fisher's extract test were used to select factors for further investigation, and prognostic analysis was carried out with the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox regression model.

resultsPlatelet counts (P = 0.027) and albumin levels (P = 0.011) were both lower in patients with recurrence than in patients without recurrence of gastric mucosal atypical hyperplasia after ESD.

conclusionsThis study reveals that low platelet counts and albumin levels were probably unfavorable prognostic factors in mucosal atypical hyperplasia of the stomach.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionPrecancerous ConditionsStomach NeoplasmsAlbuminsGastric MucosaHumansHyperplasiaPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAlbuminsAlbuminAtypical hyperplasiaEndoscopic submucosal dissectionPlateletsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID36344959
PMCPMC9641826
OpenAlexW4308407957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.