Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36344952›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Letrozole-induced endometrial preparation improved the pregnancy outcomes after frozen blastocyst transfer compared to the natural cycle: a retrospective cohort study.

Kenji Ezoe, Junichiro Fukuda, Kazumi Takeshima, Kazunori Shinohara, Keiichi Kato

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06181305 (Hormonal Replacement Therapy Plus Letrozole Incorporation Versus Letrozole Mild Ovarian Stimulation in Endometrial Preparation for Frozen Embryo Transfer), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06181305 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Hormonal Replacement Therapy Plus Letrozole Incorporation Versus Letrozole Mild Ovarian Stimulation in Endometrial Preparation for Frozen Embryo Transfer: A Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRahem Fertility CenterRan2024 to 2024Enrolled210ConditionsIVFArmsestradiol valerate and letrozole, letrozole 2,5 mg tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kenji EzoeKato Ladies Clinic, 7-20-3 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan.
Junichiro FukudaKato Ladies Clinic, 7-20-3 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan.
Kazumi TakeshimaKato Ladies Clinic, 7-20-3 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan.
Kazunori ShinoharaKato Ladies Clinic, 7-20-3 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan.
Keiichi KatoKato Ladies Clinic, 7-20-3 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan. k-kato@towako.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1394-4532

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLetrozole treatment is considered an effective option in endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfers in patients with ovulation disorders or irregular menstruation; however, the effectiveness of letrozole-induced endometrial preparation remains unclear in ovulatory patients. Furthermore, there is no comparative study reporting on pregnancy complications and congenital anomalies after frozen embryo transfers comparing natural and letrozole-assisted cycles. This study examined whether letrozole-induced endometrial preparation affected pregnancy outcomes, perinatal outcomes, and congenital anomalies after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers (SVBTs) in ovulatory patients, as compared with the natural cycle.

methodsThis historic cohort study included only patients with unexplained infertility. Overall, 14,611 patients who underwent SVBTs between July 2015 and June 2020, comprising both natural and letrozole-assisted cycles, were included. Multiple covariates that impact outcomes were used for propensity score matching; 1,911 patients in the letrozole group were matched to 12,700 patients in the natural group, and the clinical records of 1,910 patients in each group were retrospectively analysed. Cycle characteristics, pregnancy outcomes (clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth), and incidence of pregnancy complications and congenital anomalies were statistically compared between the two groups.

resultsMultivariate logistic regression analysis showed that letrozole administration during SVBT cycles significantly improved the live birth rate (P = 0.0355). Gestational age, birth length, birth weight, and infant sex, as well as the incidence of pregnancy complications and birth defects, were statistically comparable between the two groups. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the perinatal outcomes were not affected by letrozole-induced endometrial preparation.

conclusionsLetrozole-induced endometrial preparation improved the live birth rate compared with the natural cycle, without adverse effects on perinatal outcomes and congenital anomalies after SVBTs. Therefore, letrozole-induced endometrial preparation might be a safe and more effective strategy, especially for patients with insufficient luteal function.

Indexed as

Pregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeCohort StudiesCryopreservationEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansLetrozoleLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesLetrozoleBlastocyst transferCongenital anomaliesLive birthPregnancy complicationsPropensity score

Identifiers

PMID36344952
PMCPMC9639274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.