ArticleBMC ophthalmology2022
Comparison of widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography with ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography for the evaluation of lesions in retinal vein occlusion.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultra-Widefield OCTA Mapping of Epiretinal Macrophage-Like Cells in Patients With Retinal Vein Occlusion.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Retinal Characteristics in Eyes With Retinal Vein Occlusion Using Widefield Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Optimal Treatment of Retinal Vein Occlusion: An Updated Canadian Review and Recommendations.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Automated quantification of retinal non-perfusion areas in ultra-widefield SS-OCTA image of patient with retinal vascular diseases by NP-Unet model.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Article
- THE FEASIBILITY OF ULTRA-WIDEFIELD SWEPT-SOURCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY TO GUIDE LASER PHOTOCOAGULATION IN RETINAL VASCULAR DISEASES.Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- Advantages of the Utilization of Wide-Field OCT and Wide-Field OCT Angiography in Clinical Practice.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Retinal Vascular Disorders.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Wide field imaging biomarkers: A different perspective.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo compare widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) with ultra-widefield fundus fluorescein angiography (UWF-FA) for detecting retinal vein occlusion (RVO) lesions.
methodsThirty-four eyes of 32 patients with treatment-naïve RVO were enrolled at Peking University People's Hospital from September 2021 to March 2022. Patients were imaged with a UWF-FA (200°) and a widefield SS-OCTA using 24 × 20 mm scan single capture. Quantitative assessments of RVO lesions such as foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and perimeter, non-perfusion areas (NPA), number of microaneurysms (MAs), capillary changes and collateral vessels were performed.
resultsThe measurement of FAZ area and perimeter were comparable between SS-OCTA and UWF-FA (0.373 (range, 0.277-0.48) mm
conclusionCompared with UWF-FA, widefield SS-OCTA was found comparable or even superior in detecting FAZ, NPA, capillary changes and collateral vessels except MAs in RVO. Widefield SS-OCTA may offer a more efficient alternative to FA for diagnosis and monitoring RVO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.