Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36344900›Full record

ReviewMusculoskeletal surgery2023

Hypersensitivity reactions to metals in spine surgery.

S Dadkhahfar, M Chehrassan, C Faldini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S DadkhahfarSkin Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
M ChehrassanBone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. morchehrasan@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3068-9764
C FaldiniIstituto Orthopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IRIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypersensitivity to orthopedic devices is a rare condition with an underestimated incidence due to the lack of diagnostic guideline and ambiguous clinical manifestations. Although hypersensitivity to metal is common, a few cases of hypersensitivity reactions have been reported after spinal instrumentation. Spinal fusion and stabilization require a wide range of devices such as screws, wires, bands, and artificial disk replacement devices. Spinal instrumented surgeries are different from total joint arthroplasty in several aspects such as degree and pattern of motion, loading environment, and adjacent tissues with distinct characteristics. The interval for hypersensitivity reactions to occur after spinal metallic implantation is usually weeks to months. The present review covers the topic of hypersensitivity reactions that have been reported after spinal surgeries with the focus on cutaneous presentations.

Indexed as

HypersensitivitySpinal FusionArthroplastyHumansHypersensitivityInstrumentationMetalSkin reactionSpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID36344900
OpenAlexW4308426525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.