Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36344785›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023

Patient response to osteotomy around the knee joint at one year post-operation-fulfilment of expectations and current health status.

Leonard Grünwald, Steffen Schröter, Jörg Dickschas, Jörg Harrer, Philipp Minzlaff, Stefan Hinterwimmer, Tim Saier, Girish Pattappa, Peter Angele

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Leonard GrünwaldDepartment of Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Traumacenter Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. leonard@familie-gruenwald.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3516-8906
Steffen SchröterDepartment of Orthopedics and Reconstructive Surgery, Diakonie Klinikum GmbH Jung-Stilling-Krankenhaus, Siegen, Germany.
Jörg DickschasKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum Bamberg, Buger Strasse 80, 96049, Bamberg, Germany.
Jörg HarrerDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Helmut-G.-Walther Klinikum, Prof.-Arneth-Straße 2B, 96215, Lichtenfels, Germany.
Philipp MinzlaffOrthoclinic Agatharied, Krankenhaus Agatharied GmbH, Norbert-Kerkel-Platz, 83734, Hausham, Germany.
Stefan HinterwimmerOrthoPlus München, Alte Börse, Lenbachplatz 2a, 80333, Munich, Germany.
Tim SaierBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Murnau, Prof-Küntscher-Str. 8, 82418, Murnau, Germany.
Girish PattappaDepartment of Experimental Trauma Surgery, University of Regensburg Medical Centre, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Peter AngeleDepartment of Experimental Trauma Surgery, University of Regensburg Medical Centre, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
German Knee Society · DEBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Murnau · DEOTH Regensburg · DETUM Klinikum · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to investigate patient satisfaction and fulfilment of expectations after osteotomy around the knee at one year postoperatively, using patient-related outcome measures. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom the initial sample of 264 patients, a total of 132 patients (age 48y ± 11) were enrolled in this prospective study (response rate 49.3%). Data were collected using the Hospital For Special Surgery-Knee Surgery Expectations Survey (HFSS-KSES), items for satisfaction and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) measures. At one year postoperative follow-up, an individualized questionnaire asked whether the specific person-related expectations had been fulfilled.

resultsSatisfaction was high with 83.2% of all participants at one year after surgery. A total of 78% of patients stated they would decide to do the surgery again. This decision was significantly associated with satisfaction, younger age and better KOOS scores scales before surgery for pain, activity and sports. We found high correlations between satisfaction and fulfilment of expectations for the HFES-KSES. Fulfilment of expectations one year after surgery was significantly associated with significant improvements in KOOS scales at one year post-operation. Expectations (1) "to get the knee back to normal status", (2) "improve ability to squat", (3) "improve ability to run", (4) "improve ability to kneel" had been fulfilled worst. A multiple linear regression model for satisfaction had an R

conclusionsThe fulfilled expectation concerning an improvement of the ability to maintain health was the most influential parameter for satisfaction at one year post-osteotomy. Patients with better health status of the knee and younger age rated the surgery to be more positive and were also more likely to do the surgery again. This provides an indication for an earlier intervention, before the knee and overall health status becomes more detrimental. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II (Therapeutic study).

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeOsteoarthritis, KneeHealth StatusHumansKnee JointMiddle AgedMotivationOsteotomyPatient SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeExpectationHTOKneeOsteotomySatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID36344785
OpenAlexW4308410957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.