Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36344784›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023

A new knee arthrometer demonstrated to be reliable and accurate to assess anterior tibial translation in comparison with stress radiographs.

Giuseppe Milano, Alessandro Colosio, Alessandra Scaini, Marcello Motta, Andrea Raggi, Fabio Zanoni, Stefano Galli, Maristella F Saccomanno

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. BLU-DAT: a new reliable and accurate arthrometer for measuring anterior knee laxity.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe MilanoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1 c/o Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Alessandro ColosioDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1 c/o Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2, 25123, Brescia, Italy. alessandro.colosio09813@gmail.com.
Alessandra ScainiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1 c/o Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Marcello MottaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1 c/o Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Andrea RaggiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, FGP Srl, Dossobuono, VR, Italy.
Fabio ZanoniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, FGP Srl, Dossobuono, VR, Italy.
Stefano GalliDepartment of Bone and Joint Surgery, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Maristella F SaccomannoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1 c/o Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
University of Brescia · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFor several years, many arthrometers have been developed to assess anterior knee laxity. The aim of our study was to evaluate the validity of a new practical and handy testing device with the hypothesis that the new arthrometer had good validity in terms of reliability and accuracy.

methodsLachman test was performed on five fresh frozen cadaveric knees by five examiners. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was measured with a new arthrometer (BLU-DAT) and on lateral stress radiographs. Data on ATT were obtained under 7 kg (69 N), 9 kg (88 N), and maximum manual traction (MMT). Tests were performed on the same specimens before and after arthroscopic ACL excision. Inter-rater reliability of the BLU-DAT measures was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for single and average measurements. The Bland-Altman method was used to estimate agreement between the BLU-DAT and stress radiographs.

resultsICC values for single measurements were 0.62, 0.54 and 0.58 for 7-kg, 9-kg and MMT assessment, respectively. Overall reliability was good (ICC = 0.63). ICC values for average measurements were 0.89, 0.85 and 0.88 for 7-kg, 9-kg and MMT assessment, respectively. Overall reliability was very good (ICC = 0.90) SEM ranged from 1.4 mm to 1.6 mm for single measurements and was below 1 mm at each testing condition for average measurements. Analysis of agreement between BLU-DAT and radiographic measurements showed a mean difference equal to 0.83 mm ± 2.1 mm (95% CI: 0.55-1.11). Upper LOA was equal to 4.9 mm (95% CI: 5.39-4.41). Lower LOA was equal to - 3.2 mm (95% CI: - 2.71 to - 3.69).

conclusionMeasurement of anterior knee laxity with the BLU-DAT testing device has a good to very good inter-rater reliability and good agreement with a gold standard such as stress radiographs. Cadaveric Diagnostic Study, Level of Evidence IV.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesJoint InstabilityCadaverHumansKneeKnee JointReproducibility of ResultsAnterior cruciate ligamentAnterior tibial translationArthrometerKneeLaxity

Identifiers

PMID36344784
PMCPMC10192176
OpenAlexW4308433315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.