Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36344738›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2022

A side-specific nomogram for extraprostatic extension may reduce the positive surgical margin rate in radical prostatectomy.

Joris G Heetman, Timo F W Soeterik, Lieke Wever, Aswin R Meyer, Jody E Nuininga, Robert J van Soest, Harm H E van Melick, Jean-Paul P A van Basten, Roderick C N van den Bergh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joris G HeetmanDepartment of Urology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. j.heetman@antoniusziekenhuis.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9560-7387
Timo F W SoeterikDepartment of Urology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Lieke WeverDepartment of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Aswin R MeyerDepartment of Urology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Jody E NuiningaDepartment of Urology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Robert J van SoestDepartment of Urology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Harm H E van MelickDepartment of Urology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Jean-Paul P A van BastenDepartment of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Roderick C N van den BerghDepartment of Urology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNomograms predicting side-specific extraprostatic extension (EPE) may be applied to reduce positive surgical margin (PSM) rates in patients planned for radical prostatectomy (RP). This study evaluates the impact of implementing an externally validated nomogram for side-specific EPE on PSM rate and degree of nerve-sparing.

methodsIn patients planned for RP, the side-specific nomogram predictions (based on MRI, ISUP grade group, and PSA density), with an advised threshold of 20% for safe nerve-sparing, were presented preoperatively to the urological surgeon. The surgeon completed a survey before RP about the planning with respect to side-specific nerve-sparing and change of management due to the result of the nomogram. PSM rates and degree of nerve-sparing were compared to a retrospective control group treated in the months prior to the introduction of the nomogram.

resultsA total of 100 patients were included, 50 patients in both groups representing 200 prostate lobes. Of the patients, 37% had histologically confirmed EPE, and 40% a PSM. In 12% of the 100 lobes planned after nomogram presentation, a change in management due to the nomogram was reported. A per-prostate lobe analysis of all the lobes showed comparable rates of full nerve-sparing (45% vs. 30%; p = 0.083) and lower rates of PSM on the lobes with histological EPE (45% vs. 85%; p < 0.05) in the intervention (nomogram) group versus the control group.

conclusionImplementing a predictive nomogram for side-specific EPE in the surgical planning for nerve-sparing leads to lower rates PSM on the side of the histological EPE without compromising nerve-sparing.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleMargins of ExcisionNomogramsProstatectomyRetrospective StudiesNerve-sparingNomogramProstate cancerProstatectomy

Identifiers

PMID36344738
OpenAlexW4308463954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.