ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2023
Establishment and clinical application of SARS-CoV-2 catch column.
Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance Evaluation of a HBsAg-Specific Immunoadsorbent Based on a Humanized Anti-HBsAg Monoclonal Antibody.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Protein Nanoparticles for Targeted SARS-CoV-2 Trapping and Neutralization.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Blood levels of d-amino acids reflect the clinical course of COVID-19.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA certain number of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), particularly those who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the serum, are hospitalized. Further, some even die. We examined the effect of blood adsorption therapy using columns that can eliminate SARS-CoV-2 on the improvement of the prognosis of severe COVID-19 patients.
methodsThis study enrolled seven patients receiving mechanical ventilation. The patients received viral adsorption therapy using SARS-catch column for 3 days. The SARS-catch column was developed by immobilizing a specific peptide, designed based on the sequence of human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2), to an endotoxin adsorption column (PMX). In total, eight types of SARS-CoV-2-catch (SCC) candidate peptides were developed. Then, a clinical study on the effects of blood adsorption therapy using the SARS-catch column in patients with severe COVID-19 was performed, and the data in the present study were compared with historical data of severe COVID-19 patients.
resultsAmong all SCC candidate peptides, SCC-4N had the best adsorption activity against SARS-CoV-2. The SARS-catch column using SCC-4N removed 65% more SARS-CoV-2 than PMX. Compared with historical data, the weaning time from mechanical ventilation was faster in the present study. In addition, the rate of negative blood viral load in the present study was higher than that in the historical data.
conclusionThe timely treatment with virus adsorption therapy may eliminate serum SARS-CoV-2 and improve the prognosis of patients with severe COVID-19. However, large-scale studies must be performed in the future to further assess the finding of this study (jRCTs052200134).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.