Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36344691›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2023

Chronic vulvar fissure: approach with cross-linked hyaluronic acid.

Pablo González-Isaza, Manuel Sánchez-Prieto, Rafael Sánchez-Borrego

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pablo González-IsazaDIATROS, Woman's Clinic. Gynecology and Obstetrics, Teknon Medical Center, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7798-5141
Manuel Sánchez-PrietoGynecology and Obstetrics, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Sabino de Arana 5-19, 08028, Barcelona, Spain. mansan@dexeus.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7366-0446
Rafael Sánchez-BorregoDIATROS, Woman's Clinic. Gynecology and Obstetrics, Teknon Medical Center, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6583-7440
Hospital Quirón Teknon · ESTechnological University of Pereira · COUSP Institut Universitari Dexeus · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThis report aims to prospectively describe the effectiveness and safety of injected cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) for the treatment of chronic vulvar fissures.

methodsA descriptive prospective case series design including 15 patients affected by chronic vulvar fissures who were treated with cross-linked HA filler between December 2020 and July 2021. The validated 21-item Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ) was used to evaluate the results from baseline up to 9 months after the HA infiltration.

resultsA total of 15 patients suffering from chronic vulvar fissures were treated with an injection of 19 mg/mL HA filler. We found a significant improvement in VSQ scores at the end of the treatment compared to baseline. Patients reported excellent tolerance of the procedure, and no complications were recorded.

conclusionsCross-linked HA infiltration of the vulvar vestibule and posterior vaginal wall appeared to be a promising approach for chronic vulvar fissures.

Indexed as

Hyaluronic AcidVulvaFemaleHumansInjectionsVaginaHyaluronic AcidChronic vulvar fissureCross-linked hyaluronic acidDyspareuniaPosterior fourchette fissuringTreatmentVulvovaginal atrophy

Identifiers

PMID36344691
OpenAlexW4308409993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.