Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36344672›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2023

Targeting HER2-positive breast cancer: advances and future directions.

Sandra M Swain, Mythili Shastry, Erika Hamilton

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 671 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
671citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
97.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

671 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,000 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

611 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra M SwainDepartment of Medicine, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA. sandra.swain@georgetown.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1320-3830
Mythili ShastrySarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2445-8094
Erika HamiltonSarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1911-0336
Sarah Cannon · USGeorgetown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The long-sought discovery of HER2 as an actionable and highly sensitive therapeutic target was a major breakthrough for the treatment of highly aggressive HER2-positive breast cancer, leading to approval of the first HER2-targeted drug - the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab - almost 25 years ago. Since then, progress has been swift and the impressive clinical activity across multiple trials with monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates that target HER2 has spawned extensive efforts to develop newer platforms and more targeted therapies. This Review discusses the current standards of care for HER2-positive breast cancer, mechanisms of resistance to HER2-targeted therapy and new therapeutic approaches and agents, including strategies to harness the immune system.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansTrastuzumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID36344672
PMCPMC9640784
OpenAlexW4308766741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.