ArticleScientific reports2022
A bioinformatics approach to the identification of novel deleterious mutations of human TPMT through validated screening and molecular dynamics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of diagnostic screening test for pharmacogenomic targets for thiopurine drugs in indian pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- The impact of mutations on TP53 protein and MicroRNA expression in HNSCC: Novel insights for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.PloS one · 2025Article
- Unraveling the function and structure impact of deleterious missense SNPs in the human OX1R receptor by computational analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Population-Specific Distribution ofTherapeutics and clinical risk management · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polymorphisms of Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) are known to be associated with leukemia, inflammatory bowel diseases, and more. The objective of the present study was to identify novel deleterious missense SNPs of TPMT through a comprehensive in silico protocol. The initial SNP screening protocol used to identify deleterious SNPs from the pool of all TPMT SNPs in the dbSNP database yielded an accuracy of 83.33% in identifying extremely dangerous variants. Five novel deleterious missense SNPs (W33G, W78R, V89E, W150G, and L182P) of TPMT were identified through the aforementioned screening protocol. These 5 SNPs were then subjected to conservation analysis, interaction analysis, oncogenic and phenotypic analysis, structural analysis, PTM analysis, and molecular dynamics simulations (MDS) analysis to further assess and analyze their deleterious nature. Oncogenic analysis revealed that all five SNPs are oncogenic. MDS analysis revealed that all SNPs are deleterious due to the alterations they cause in the binding energy of the wild-type protein. Plasticity-induced instability caused by most of the mutations as indicated by the MDS results has been hypothesized to be the reason for this alteration. While in vivo or in vitro protocols are more conclusive, they are often more challenging and expensive. Hence, future research endeavors targeted at TPMT polymorphisms and/or their consequences in relevant disease progressions or treatments, through in vitro or in vivo means can give a higher priority to these SNPs rather than considering the massive pool of all SNPs of TPMT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.