ArticleScientific reports2022
Membrane damage mechanism of protocatechualdehyde against Micrococcus luteus and its effect on pork quality characteristics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The MoroccanFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Environmental stressor assessment of hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria biofilms from a marine oil spill.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- Transcriptome Analysis of Protocatechualdehyde againstFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Immunomodulation in diabetic wounds healing: The intersection of macrophage reprogramming and immunotherapeutic hydrogels.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the mechanism of membrane damage by protocatechualdehyde (PCA) against Micrococcus luteus and assessed effects of PCA on the sensory and physicochemical properties of pork. The mechanism of PCA inhibition on M. luteus was studied by determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) based on membrane potential, intracellular ATP concentration, intracellular pH, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), and field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM). The results showed that the MIC of PCA against M. luteus was 1.25 mg/mL. Hyperpolarization of the bacterial cell membrane, a decrease in the intracellular ATP concentration, and intracellular pH indicated that PCA damaged the cell membrane of M. luteus. FEG-SEM observation revealed that PCA could cause surface collapse, cell membrane rupture, and content outflow of M. luteus. Additionally, PCA was found to inhibit increases in the total number of colonies, the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) value growth rate, and moisture mobility in raw pork. Additionally, it improved the color and texture of raw pork, all of which effectively prolonged its shelf life. This study will encourage the application of PCA as a natural antibacterial agent in the food industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.