ArticleScientific reports2022
A novel puncture approach via point "O" for percutaneous kyphoplasty in patients with L4 or L5 osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Unilateral extrapedicular versus unilateral and bilateral transpedicular approaches in percutaneous vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A meta-analysis.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Percutaneous vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: minimally invasive techniques and clinical outcomes.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- A novel unilateral extrapedicular approach applied to percutaneous vertebral augmentation to treat thoracic and lumbar Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: a retrospective study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Enhanced bone cement distribution in percutaneous vertebroplasty using a curved guide wire: a propensity score matching analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Finite element analysis of precise puncture vertebral augmentation in the treatment of different types of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Percutaneous kyphoplasty through unilateral puncture on the convex side for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture with scoliosis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study introduced a novel point "O" puncture approach for percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in patients with L4 or L5 osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) and evaluated its clinical and radiographic outcomes. Between September 2019 and December 2020, we compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes in 31 cases (36 vertebrae) using the "O" entry point PKP intervention (O-PKP) and 31 cases (37 vertebrae) using transverse the process-pedicle approach PKP intervention (T-PKP). No serious postoperative complications were observed in any of the participants. Only two T-PKP patients experienced intervertebral disc space leakage. Compared with the T-PKP patients, the O-PKP patients showed shorter operative time and fluoroscopy times (P < 0.05), comparable blood loss and cement volume (P > 0.05), improved VAS and ODI scores at the final follow-up (P < 0.05), better increases in the vertebral compression ratio (P < 0.05), comparable Cobb angle (P > 0.05), comparable anteroposterior bone cement distribution, enhanced bilateral bone cement distribution (P < 0.05), and larger sagittal and transverse angles (P < 0.05). Herein, O-PKP was indicated for patients with L4 or L5 OVCF. This puncture approach showed significant advantages over T-PKP not only in terms of pain relief, surgery and fluoroscopy times but also in the puncture angle, vertebral reconstruction, and symmetrical cement distribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.