Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36344549›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Threat learning impairs subsequent associative inference.

Olivier T de Vries, Raoul P P P Grasman, Merel Kindt, Vanessa A van Ast

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Integration of conditioned threat with pre-existing memories.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olivier T de VriesDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. o.t.devries@uva.nl.
Raoul P P P GrasmanDepartment of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Merel KindtDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vanessa A van AstDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. V.A.vanAst@uva.nl.
University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

EPA EP-D-16-021Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 451-16-021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite it being widely acknowledged that the most important function of memory is to facilitate the prediction of significant events in a complex world, no studies to date have investigated how our ability to infer associations across distinct but overlapping experiences is affected by the inclusion of threat memories. To address this question, participants (n = 35) encoded neutral predictive associations (A → B). The following day these memories were reactivated by pairing B with a new aversive or neutral outcome (B → C

Indexed as

LearningMental RecallArousalCuesEmotionsHumans

Identifiers

PMID36344549
PMCPMC9640532
OpenAlexW4308774037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.