Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36344000›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Community collaboration to improve access and outcomes in breast cancer reconstruction: protocol for a mixed-methods qualitative research study.

Lily R Mundy, Bryanna Stukes, Moreen Njoroge, Laura Jane Fish, Amanda R Sergesketter, Sabrina M Wang, Valarie Worthy, Oluwadamilola M Fayanju, Rachel A Greenup, Scott T Hollenbeck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 74% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lily R MundyDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Mundy.lily@gmail.com.
Bryanna StukesDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Moreen NjorogeDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Laura Jane FishDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Amanda R SergesketterDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Sabrina M WangDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9225-585X
Valarie WorthyDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Oluwadamilola M FayanjuDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rachel A GreenupDepartment of Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Scott T HollenbeckDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke University · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreast reconstruction plays an important role for many in restoring form and function of the breast after mastectomy. However, rates of breast reconstruction in the USA vary significantly by race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. The lower rates of breast reconstruction in non-white women and in women of lower socioeconomic status may reflect a complex interplay between patient and physician factors and access to care. It remains unknown what community-specific barriers may be impacting receipt of breast reconstruction. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a mixed-methods study combining qualitative patient interview data with quantitative practice patterns to develop an actionable plan to address disparities in breast reconstruction in the local community. The primary aims are to (1) capture barriers to breast reconstruction for patients in the local community, (2) quantitatively evaluate practice patterns at the host institution and (3) identify issues and prioritise interventions for change using community-based engagement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained at the investigators' institution. Results from both the quantitative and qualitative portions of the study will be circulated via peer-review publication. These findings will also serve as pilot data for extramural funding to implement and evaluate these proposed solutions.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyBreastFemaleHumansMastectomyQualitative ResearchPlastic & reconstructive surgeryPLASTIC & RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERYProtocols & guidelinesPUBLIC HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID36344000
PMCPMC9644344
OpenAlexW4308435243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.