Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36343988›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Effects of insoles adapted in flip-flop sandals for persistent heel pain: a protocol for a sham-controlled randomised trial.

Marina Gomes Fagundes, André Augusto Martines Teixeira Mendes, Germanna Medeiros Barbosa, Marcelo Cardoso de Souza

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04784598 (Effects of Insoles Adapted in Flip-flop Sandals in People With Heel Pain), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04784598 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Insoles Adapted in Flip-flop Sandals in People With Heel Pain: a Randomized, Double-blind Clinical, Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteRan2022 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsHeel Pain Syndrome, HeelArmsInsoles adapted in flip-flop sandals
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marina Gomes FagundesPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Santa Cruz, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4633-5917
André Augusto Martines Teixeira MendesMasters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7566-9492
Germanna Medeiros BarbosaPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Santa Cruz, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1094-334X
Marcelo Cardoso de SouzaPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil marcelo.cardoso@ufrn.br.ORCID 0000-0002-9268-8353
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversidade Cidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPersistent heel pain is a prevalent complaint affecting up to 10% of the population. Insoles adapted in flip-flop sandals are an alternative treatment for pain and function of individuals with persistent heel pain, showing improvement within 12 weeks of treatment. Most studies considered foot posture and biomechanics to prescribe insoles for persistent heel pain, but few verified the effects of a 12-week treatment on pain catastrophising. This study will investigate the effects of insoles adapted in flip-flop sandals on pain intensity, function, functional walking capacity and pain catastrophising of individuals with persistent heel pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for a sham-controlled randomised trial. Eighty individuals with persistent heel pain will be assessed and randomised into two intervention groups: insoles adapted in flip-flop sandals and flip-flop sandals with sham (ie, flat) insoles. Assessments will be conducted at baseline (T0), after 6 weeks (T6), 12 weeks postintervention (T12) and after a 4-week follow-up (T16). The primary outcome will be the pain intensity, and secondary outcomes will be foot function, functional walking capacity and pain catastrophising. Analysis of variance with mixed design (if normal distribution) or Friedman's test (if not normal distribution) will verify intergroup and intragroup differences. Bonferroni post hoc tests will be performed in case of significant group or time interaction. Intent-to-treat analysis will be used, and a significance level of 5% and 95% CIs will be considered. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the research ethics committee of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (registry no. 4,018,821). Results will be disseminated to individuals, submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and disclosed in scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04784598.

Indexed as

Foot DiseasesHeelFootHumansPainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicShoesFoot & anklePAIN MANAGEMENTREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID36343988
PMCPMC9644330
OpenAlexW4308435725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.