ArticleThe Journal of infection2023
Prevalence and risk factors of bacterial enteric pathogens in men who have sex with men: A cross-sectional study at the UK's largest sexual health service.
Article in The Journal of infection, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acceptability and Feasibility of Longitudinal Sampling for Sexually Transmitted Enteric Infections in Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men (GBMSM): Prospective Cohort Pilot Study Conducted in 2022 in South East England.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2026Article
- Sexually transmitted enteric infections in men who have sex with men.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- The emergence of sexually transmissibleMicrobial genomics · 2025Article
- Article
- Risk factors and provider awareness of sexually transmitted enteric pathogens among men who have sex with men.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Pathogenicity and virulence ofVirulence · 2023Review
- Management of asymptomatic sexually transmitted infections in Europe: towards a differentiated, evidence-based approach.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesOutbreaks of bacterial enteric pathogens (BEPs) in men who have sex with men (MSM) associated with antimicrobial resistance are a public health concern. We investigated the prevalence and risk factors of BEPs in MSM to inform infection control.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study at a London sexual health clinic between 20/12/2017 and 06/02/2018. Residual rectal swabs from MSM attending for sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing were anonymously tested for a range of BEPs using real-time PCR. A sub-set of samples were tested for the mphA gene (a marker of azithromycin resistance). Results were linked to electronic health records.
resultsBEPs were detected in 207 of 2116 participants, giving an overall prevalence of 9.8% (95% CI 8.5%-11.1%) ranging from 0.8% (0.4%-1.2%) for Shigella to 4.9% (4.0%-5.9%) for Enteroaggregative E. coli. MSM with BEPs were more likely to have a history of bacterial STIs (p = 0.010), to report more sexual partners (p<0.001), and among HIV-negative MSM, to report current HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use (p<0.001). Gastrointestinal symptoms were rare (1.7%) and not associated with BEPs. 41.3% of MSM with BEPs and 14.1% of those without BEPs carried mphA (p<0.001). Among the former, this was associated with a history of bacterial STIs (51.5% vs 31.1%, p = 0.003).
conclusionsOne in ten MSM had a BEP detected and most did not report symptoms. MphA carriage was common, particularly among those with BEPs. Bacterial STI treatment might contribute to selection of resistant gut organisms, emphasising the need for better antimicrobial stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.