ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2022
A clinical study of artery of Percheron infarction.
Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The clinical significance of artery of Percheron in cerebral ischemia: a summary overview.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Insight Into Uncommon Territory: Exploring Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia in Artery of Percheron Infarct.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artery of Percheron (AOP) infarction, a rare cause of acute altered mental status (AMS), is characterized by bilateral paramedian thalamic infarction. The aim of this study was to review the clinical manifestation, radiological patterns, treatment, and prognosis of patients with AOP infarction. This retrospective case series included patients with AOP infarction from 2009 to 2020 from a medical center in Taiwan. We defined AOP infarction as acute bilateral paramedian thalamic infarction from magnetic resonance imaging, and patients were further categorized by their additional AOP territorial involvements. We determined outcomes with the modified Rankin Scale at discharge. Among the 10 included patients, AMS was the most common presentation (90%). We identified two patients with bilateral vertebral artery (VA), five with unilateral posterior cerebral artery (PCA), and one with bilateral PCA occlusion. Atherosclerosis was the most common presumed etiology (60%). Two and eight patients had favorable and unfavorable prognoses, respectively. PCA occlusion, rather than VA and BA occlusion, was common in angiography. Residual symptoms often resulted in significant disability at discharge. Basilar tip syndrome may share indistinguishable thalamic infarct patterns with AOP infarction but could be differentiated by angiography and other infarcted territories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.