Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36343255›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Assessing effective radiative forcing from aerosol-cloud interactions over the global ocean.

Casey J Wall, Joel R Norris, Anna Possner, Daniel T McCoy, Isabel L McCoy, Nicholas J Lutsko

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Assessing effective radiative forcing from aerosol-cloud interactions over the global ocean.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Casey J WallScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.ORCID 0000-0001-7682-5576
Joel R NorrisScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.ORCID 0000-0003-4384-0977
Anna PossnerInstitute for Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, 60438, Germany.
Daniel T McCoyDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071.
Isabel L McCoyRosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33149.ORCID 0000-0002-9989-0570
Nicholas J LutskoScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.ORCID 0000-0003-2733-7810
Scripps Institution of Oceanography · USGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Wyoming · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How clouds respond to anthropogenic sulfate aerosols is one of the largest sources of uncertainty in the radiative forcing of climate over the industrial era. This uncertainty limits our ability to predict equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS)-the equilibrium global warming following a doubling of atmospheric CO

Indexed as

ClimateMeteorologyAerosolsOceans and SeasSulfatesAerosolsSulfatesaerosol–cloud interactionsaerosol radiative forcingclimate changeclimate sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID36343255
PMCPMC9674239
OpenAlexW4308430542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.