Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36343248›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Environmental drivers of the first major animal extinction across the Ediacaran White Sea-Nama transition.

Scott D Evans, Chenyi Tu, Adriana Rizzo, Rachel L Surprenant, Phillip C Boan, Heather McCandless, Nathan Marshall, Shuhai Xiao, Mary L Droser

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
41.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Great late Ediacaran ice age.National science review · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Scott D EvansDepartment of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061.ORCID 0000-0001-5654-8495
Chenyi TuDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.ORCID 0000-0001-6270-3041
Adriana RizzoDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.ORCID 0000-0003-1664-2756
Rachel L SurprenantDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.
Phillip C BoanDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.
Heather McCandlessDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.ORCID 0000-0003-0206-1547
Nathan MarshallDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.
Shuhai XiaoDepartment of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061.ORCID 0000-0003-4655-2663
Mary L DroserDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.
University of California, Riverside · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Ediacara Biota-the oldest communities of complex, macroscopic fossils-consists of three temporally distinct assemblages: the Avalon (ca. 575-560 Ma), White Sea (ca. 560-550 Ma), and Nama (ca. 550-539 Ma). Generic diversity varies among assemblages, with a notable decline at the transition from White Sea to Nama. Preservation and sampling biases, biotic replacement, and environmental perturbation have been proposed as potential mechanisms for this drop in diversity. Here, we compile a global database of the Ediacara Biota, specifically targeting taphonomic and paleoecological characters, to test these hypotheses. Major ecological shifts in feeding mode, life habit, and tiering level accompany an increase in generic richness between the Avalon and White Sea assemblages. We find that ∼80% of White Sea taxa are absent from the Nama interval, comparable to loss during Phanerozoic mass extinctions. The paleolatitudes, depositional environments, and preservational modes that characterize the White Sea assemblage are well represented in the Nama, indicating that this decline is not the result of sampling bias. Counter to expectations of the biotic replacement model, there are minimal ecological differences between these two assemblages. However, taxa that disappear exhibit a variety of morphological and behavioral characters consistent with an environmentally driven extinction event. The preferential survival of taxa with high surface area relative to volume may suggest that this was related to reduced global oceanic oxygen availability. Thus, our data support a link between Ediacaran biotic turnover and environmental change, similar to other major mass extinctions in the geologic record.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionFossilsAnimalsBiotaExtinction, BiologicalOceans and SeasbiodiversityEdiacara Biotaenvironmental changeextinctionoxygen

Identifiers

PMID36343248
PMCPMC9674242
OpenAlexW4308430347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.