Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36342961›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Estimation of the morbidity and mortality of congenital Chagas disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sarah Matthews, Ayzsa Tannis, Karl Philipp Puchner, Maria Elena Bottazzi, Maria Luisa Cafferata, Daniel Comandé, Pierre Buekens

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Prevalence ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Chagas Disease in Europe.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Sarah MatthewsTulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America.
Ayzsa TannisTulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0396-0264
Karl Philipp PuchnerGerman Leprosy and TB Relief Association, Würzburg, Germany.
Maria Elena BottazziNational School of Tropical Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Maria Luisa CafferataInstituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Daniel ComandéInstituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pierre BuekensTulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America.
Tulane University · USInstituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria · ARBaylor College of Medicine · USDeutsche Lepra- und Tuberkulosehilfe · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chagas disease is caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi which can be transmitted from mother to baby during pregnancy. There is no consensus on the proportion of infected infants with clinical signs of congenital Chagas disease (cCD). The objective of this systematic review is to determine the burden of cCD. Articles from journal inception to 2020 reporting morbidity and mortality associated with cCD were retrieved from academic search databases. Observational studies, randomized-control trials, and studies of babies diagnosed with cCD were included. Studies were excluded if they were case reports or series, without original data, case-control without cCD incidence estimates, and/or did not report number of participants. Two reviewers screened articles for inclusion. To determine pooled proportion of infants with cCD with clinical signs, individual clinical signs, and case-fatality, random effects meta-analysis was performed. We identified 4,531 records and reviewed 4,301, including 47 articles in the narrative summary and analysis. Twenty-eight percent of cCD infants showed clinical signs (95% confidence interval (CI) = 19.0%, 38.5%) and 2.2% of infants died (95% CI = 1.3%, 3.5%). The proportion of infected infants with hepatosplenomegaly was 12.5%, preterm birth 6.0%, low birth weight 5.8%, anemia 4.9%, and jaundice 4.7%. Although most studies did not include a comparison group of non-infected infants, the proportion of infants with cCD with clinical signs at birth are comparable to those with congenital toxoplasmosis (10.0%-30.0%) and congenital cytomegalovirus (10.0%-15.0%). We conclude that cCD burden appears significant, but more studies comparing infected mother-infant dyads to non-infected ones are needed to determine an association of this burden to cCD.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseasePremature BirthTrypanosoma cruziFemaleHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornMorbidityPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36342961
PMCPMC9671465
OpenAlexW4308365605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.