Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36342852›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2023

Cost-effectiveness of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in adults with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.

Kunal C Potnis, Mengyang Di, Iris Isufi, Lohith Gowda, Stuart E Seropian, Francine M Foss, Howard P Forman, Scott F Huntington

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Clinical development of allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor αβ-T cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Engineering signalling pathways in mammalian cells.Nature biomedical engineering · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kunal C PotnisYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Mengyang DiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Iris IsufiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Lohith GowdaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Stuart E SeropianDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Francine M FossDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.ORCID 0000-0001-7843-3162
Howard P FormanDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.ORCID 0000-0002-3096-835X
Scott F HuntingtonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.ORCID 0000-0001-7071-6475
Yale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is traditionally considered treatable but incurable. In March 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) FL after ≥2 lines of therapy. Priced at $373 000, CAR T-cell therapy is potentially curative, and its cost-effectiveness compared with other modern R/R FL treatment strategies is unknown. We developed a Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of third-line CAR T-cell vs standard of care (SOC) therapies in adults with R/R FL. We estimated progression rates for patients receiving CAR T-cell and SOC therapies from the ZUMA-5 trial and the LEO CReWE study, respectively. We calculated costs, discounted life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CAR T-cell vs SOC therapies with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000 per QALY. Our analysis was conducted from a US payer's perspective over a lifetime horizon. In our base-case model, the cost of the CAR T-cell strategy was $731 682 compared with $458 490 for SOC therapies. However, CAR T-cell therapy was associated with incremental clinical benefit of 1.50 QALYs, resulting in an ICER of $182 127 per QALY. Our model was most sensitive to the utilities associated with CAR T-cell therapy remission and third-line SOC therapies and to the total upfront CAR T-cell therapy cost. Under current pricing, CAR T-cell therapy is unlikely to be cost-effective in unselected patients with FL in the third-line setting. Both randomized clinical trials and longer term clinical follow-up can help clarify the benefits of CAR T-cell therapy and optimal sequencing in patients with FL.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, FollicularReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAdultCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID36342852
PMCPMC10011202
OpenAlexW4308370165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.