Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36342763›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2022

The Use of Smartphone Keystroke Dynamics to Passively Monitor Upper Limb and Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis: Longitudinal Analysis.

Ka-Hoo Lam, James Twose, Birgit Lissenberg-Witte, Giovanni Licitra, Kim Meijer, Bernard Uitdehaag, Vincent De Groot, Joep Killestein

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Sensors in Multiple Sclerosis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Digital Neuropsychology beyond Computerized Cognitive Assessment: Applications of Novel Digital Technologies.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ka-Hoo LamDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (VU University Medical Center location), Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0926-1445
James TwoseNeurocast BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8499-0256
Birgit Lissenberg-WitteDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (VU University Medical Center location), Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9448-1826
Giovanni LicitraNeurocast BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0585-0189
Kim MeijerNeurocast BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0416-1488
Bernard UitdehaagDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (VU University Medical Center location), Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9226-7364
Vincent De GrootDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (VU University Medical Center location), Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6073-6250
Joep KillesteinDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (VU University Medical Center location), Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6347-5957

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTyping on smartphones, which has become a near daily activity, requires both upper limb and cognitive function. Analysis of keyboard interactions during regular typing, that is, keystroke dynamics, could therefore potentially be utilized for passive and continuous monitoring of function in patients with multiple sclerosis.

objectiveTo determine whether passively acquired smartphone keystroke dynamics correspond to multiple sclerosis outcomes, we investigated the association between keystroke dynamics and clinical outcomes (upper limb and cognitive function). This association was investigated longitudinally in order to study within-patient changes independently of between-patient differences.

methodsDuring a 1-year follow-up, arm function and information processing speed were assessed every 3 months in 102 patients with multiple sclerosis with the Nine-Hole Peg Test and Symbol Digit Modalities Test, respectively. Keystroke-dynamics data were continuously obtained from regular typing on the participants' own smartphones. Press-and-release latency of the alphanumeric keys constituted the fine motor score cluster, while latency of the punctuation and backspace keys constituted the cognition score cluster. The association over time between keystroke clusters and the corresponding clinical outcomes was assessed with linear mixed models with subjects as random intercepts. By centering around the mean and calculating deviation scores within subjects, between-subject and within-subject effects were distinguished.

resultsMean (SD) scores for the fine motor score cluster and cognition score cluster were 0.43 (0.16) and 0.94 (0.41) seconds, respectively. The fine motor score cluster was significantly associated with the Nine-Hole Peg Test: between-subject β was 15.9 (95% CI 12.2-19.6) and within-subject β was 6.9 (95% CI 2.0-11.9). The cognition score cluster was significantly associated with the Symbol Digit Modalities Test between subjects (between-subject β -11.2, 95% CI -17.3 to -5.2) but not within subjects (within-subject β -0.4, 95% CI -5.6 to 4.9).

conclusionsSmartphone keystroke dynamics were longitudinally associated with multiple sclerosis outcomes. Worse arm function corresponded with longer latency in typing both across and within patients. Worse processing speed corresponded with higher latency in using punctuation and backspace keys across subjects. Hence, keystroke dynamics are a potential digital biomarker for remote monitoring and predicting clinical outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register NTR7268; https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NTR7268.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisSmartphoneActivities of Daily LivingCognitionHumansUpper Extremitycognitiondigital technologykeystroke dynamicsmobile appmultiple sclerosisoutpatient monitoringsmartphonetypingupper extremity

Identifiers

PMID36342763
PMCPMC9679948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.