Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36342716›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Comparison of Evaluations for Heart Transplant Before Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device and Subsequent Receipt of Transplant at Transplant vs Nontransplant Centers.

Thomas M Cascino, Jeffrey S McCullough, Xiaoting Wu, Michael J Pienta, James W Stewart, Robert B Hawkins, Alexander A Brescia, Ashraf Abou El Ala, Min Zhang, Pierre-Emmanuel Noly and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas M CascinoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Jeffrey S McCulloughDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Xiaoting WuDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Michael J PientaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
James W StewartDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Robert B HawkinsDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Alexander A BresciaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Ashraf Abou El AlaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Min ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Pierre-Emmanuel NolyDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Jonathan W HaftDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Jennifer A CowgerDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Monica ColvinDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Keith D AaronsonDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Francis D PaganiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Donald S LikoskyDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Michigan Congestive Heart Failure Investigators
University of Michigan · USHenry Ford Hospital · US

Funding

Training to Advance Care Through Implementation Science in Cardiac And Lung Illnesses (TACTICAL)K12HL138039 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BARNES, GEOFFREY DOUGLAS, PRESCOTT, HALLIE CHRISTINE · 2017 to 2021
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL138039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services revised its national coverage determination, removing the requirement to obtain review from a Medicare-approved heart transplant center to implant a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) for bridge-to-transplant (BTT) intent at an LVAD-only center. The association between center-level transplant availability and access to heart transplant, the gold-standard therapy for advanced heart failure (HF), is unknown. Objective: To investigate the association of center transplant availability with LVAD implant strategies and subsequent heart transplant following LVAD implant before the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services policy change. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs multicenter US registry database was conducted from April 1, 2012, to June 30, 2020. The population included patients with HF receiving a primary durable LVAD. Exposures: LVAD center transplant availability (LVAD/transplant vs LVAD only). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were implant strategy as BTT and subsequent transplant by 2 years. Covariates that might affect listing strategy and outcomes were included (eg, patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities) in multivariable models. Parameters for BTT listing were estimated using logistic regression with center-level random effects and for receipt of a transplant using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with death as a competing event. Results: The sample included 22 221 LVAD recipients with a median age of 59.0 (IQR, 50.0-67.0) years, of whom 17 420 (78.4%) were male and 3156 (14.2%) received implants at LVAD-only centers. Receiving an LVAD at an LVAD/transplant center was associated with a 79% increased adjusted odds of BTT LVAD designation (odds ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.35-2.38; P < .001). The 2-year transplant rate following LVAD implant was 25.6% at LVAD/transplant centers and 11.9% at LVAD-only centers. There was an associated 33% increased rate of transplant at LVAD/transplant centers compared with LVAD-only centers (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.17-1.51) with a similar hazard for death at 2 years (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.90-1.08). Conclusions and Relevance: Receiving an LVAD at an LVAD-transplant center was associated with increased odds of BTT intent at implant and subsequent transplant receipt for patients at 2 years. The findings of this study suggest that Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services policy change may have the unintended consequence of further increasing inequities in access to transplant among patients at LVAD-only centers.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesHeart FailureHeart TransplantationAgedFemaleHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36342716
PMCPMC9641540
OpenAlexW4308457401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.