Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36342660›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2023

Lack of molecular evidence of fecal-borne viruses in capybaras from São Paulo state, Brazil, 2018-2020: a minor public health issue.

Lais Sampaio de Azevedo, Yasmin França, Ellen Viana, Roberta Salzone Medeiros, Simone Guadagnucci Morillo, Raquel Guiducci, Cibele Daniel Ribeiro, Heloisa Rosa Vieira, Karolina Morales Barrio-Nuevo, Mariana Sequetin Cunha and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lais Sampaio de AzevedoEnteric Disease Laboratory, Virology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Yasmin FrançaEnteric Disease Laboratory, Virology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Ellen VianaEnteric Disease Laboratory, Virology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Roberta Salzone MedeirosEnteric Disease Laboratory, Virology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Simone Guadagnucci MorilloEnteric Disease Laboratory, Virology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Raquel GuiducciEnteric Disease Laboratory, Virology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Cibele Daniel RibeiroEnteric Disease Laboratory, Virology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Heloisa Rosa VieiraEnteric Disease Laboratory, Virology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Karolina Morales Barrio-NuevoVector Borne Diseases Laboratory, Virology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Mariana Sequetin CunhaVector Borne Diseases Laboratory, Virology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Juliana Mariotti GuerraQuantitative Pathology Laboratory, Pathology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Dulcilena de Matos Castro E SilvaMicology Laboratory, Parasitology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Valter Batista Duo FilhoMicology Laboratory, Parasitology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Emerson Luiz Lima AraújoGeneral Coordination of Public Health, Laboratories of the Strategic Articulation, Department of the Health, Surveillance Secretariat, Ministry of Health (CGLAB/DAEVS/SVS-MS), Brasília, Brazil.
Sérgio Roberto Santos FerreiraCruzeiro Do Sul University, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Camila Freitas BatistaCruzeiro Do Sul University, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Gislaine Celestino Dutra da SilvaSão José Do Rio Preto School of Medicine (FAMERP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Maurício Lacerda NogueiraSão José Do Rio Preto School of Medicine (FAMERP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Cintia Mayumi AhagonBlood and Sexual Diseases - Retrovirus Laboratory, Virology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Regina Célia MoreiraHepatitis Laboratory, Virology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Lia CunhaHepatitis Laboratory, Virology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Vanessa Santos MoraisMedical Parasitology Laboratory (LIM/46), Institute of Tropical Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Antonio Charlys da CostaMedical Parasitology Laboratory (LIM/46), Institute of Tropical Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Adriana LuchsEnteric Disease Laboratory, Virology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil. driluchs@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4131-990X
Instituto Adolfo Lutz · BRFaculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto · BRUniversidade Cruzeiro do Sul · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRMinistério da Saúde · BR

Funding

Coordinating Research on Emerging Arboviral Threats Encompassing the Neotropics II (CREATE-NEO II)U01AI151807 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI Kathryn Alyce Hanley, MAURICIO Lacerda NOGUEIRA · 2020 to 2026
$9.8M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI151807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capybara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) is the world's largest rodent species distributed throughout South America. These animals are incredibly tolerant to anthropogenic environments and are occupying large urban centers. Capybaras are known to carry potentially zoonotic agents, including R. rickettsia, Leishmania spp., Leptospira spp., Trypanosoma spp., Salmonella spp., Toxoplasma gondii, and rabies virus. Focusing on the importance of monitoring potential sources of emerging zoonotic viruses and new viral reservoirs, the aim of the present study was to assess the presence of fecal-borne viruses in the feces of capybaras living in urban parks in São Paulo state, Brazil. A total of 337 fecal samples were collected between 2018 and 2020 and screened for the following: (i) Rotavirus group A (RVA) by ELISA; (ii) non-RVA species and Picobirnavirus (PBV) using PAGE; (iii) Human Bocaparvovirus (HBoV), Bufavirus (BuV), Tusavirus (TuV), and Cutavirus (CuV) qPCR; (iv) Human Enterovirus (EV), Norovirus GII (NoV), and Hantavirus by in houses RT-qPCR; (v) SARS-CoV-2 via commercial RT-qPCR kit assay; and (vi) Astrovirus (AstV) and Adenovirus (AdV) using conventional nested (RT)-PCRs. All fecal samples tested were negative for fecal-borne viruses. This study adds further evidence that the fecal-borne viruses is a minor public health issue in Brazilian capybaras, at least during the surveillance period and surveyed areas. Continuous monitoring of sylvatic animals is essential to prevent and control the emergence or re-emergence of newly discovered virus as well as viruses with known zoonotic potential.

Indexed as

COVID-19Public HealthAnimalsBrazilFecesHumansRodentiaSARS-CoV-2CapybarasFecal-borne virusesMolecular surveillanceVirus reservoirZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID36342660
PMCPMC9640885
OpenAlexW4308447262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.