Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36342582›Full record

ReviewMetabolic brain disease2023

Blood-based biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease: a mini-review.

Sanjana P Padala, Paul A Newhouse

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolic brain disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Fluid biomarkers in cerebral amyloid angiopathy.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanjana P PadalaVanderbilt University , 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA. sanjana.p.padala@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5078-8869
Paul A NewhouseVanderbilt University , 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9298-7185
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Long-Term Nicotine Treatment of Mild Cognitive Impairment - Bridge FundingR01AG047992 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI AISEN, PAUL S., NEWHOUSE, PAUL A. · 2015 to 2021
$13.4M
Health of the Cholinergic System and Risk for Alzheimer's Disease in Postmenopausal WomenR01AG066159 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI DUMAS, JULIE A, NEWHOUSE, PAUL A. · 2019 to 2023
$7.9M
Long-Term Nicotine Treatment of Mild Cognitive ImpairmentR56AG047992 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI AISEN, PAUL S., NEWHOUSE, PAUL A. · 2022 to 2022
$6.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG047992NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066159NIA NIH HHS R56 AG047992NIH HHS R01AG066159NIH HHS R56AG047992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia and has far reaching consequences for patients and their caregivers. Early detection and treatment are key factors in limiting the impact of the disease. However, a definitive diagnosis of AD requires an examination of brain tissue during an autopsy. Although a plethora of biomarkers such as neuroimaging, electrophysiological, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are available, their utility is limited to research due to their poor reach and prohibitive cost. In order for biomarkers to be widely used, they need to be accessible, affordable, and conducive for the patient population or disease stage. Blood-based biomarkers may not only be less expensive and more accessible compared to neuroimaging or CSF tests, but they are also preferred by patients with AD as they are much less invasive. In this mini-review article, we expand on the rationale for the use of blood-based biomarkers, review currently available biomarkers and discuss the need for the standardization of these biomarkers. We contrast the blood-based biomarkers with other available biomarkers and discuss the advantages of using a panel of blood-based biomarkers to strengthen their accuracy.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersAmyloid beta-PeptidesBrainEarly DiagnosisHumansNeuroimagingtau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkerstau ProteinsAlzheimer’s diseaseBiomarkersBlood-based biomarkersCSFNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID36342582
PMCPMC10688968
OpenAlexW4308367660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.