Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36342488›Full record

ArticleAMA journal of ethics2022

If Patients Don't Use Available Health Service Pricing Information, Is Transparency Still Important?

Christopher Whaley, Austin Frakt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMA journal of ethics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cloudiness in price transparency for hernia repair.American journal of surgery · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher WhaleyEconomist with the RAND Corporation and a professor in the Frederick S. Pardee RAND Graduate School in Santa Monica, California.
Austin FraktDirector of the Partnered Evidence-Based Policy Resource Center at the VA Boston Healthcare System and a professor at Boston University School of Public Health.

Funding

The Effects of Insurance Benefit Design Innovation on Patient HealthK01AG061274 · NIA · RAND CORPORATION · PI WHALEY, CHRISTOPHER · 2019 to 2023
$649k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG061274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The US health system is replete with health service pricing idiosyncrasies and opacity unrelated to quality. Online tools intended to make health care purchasing resemble consumerism by making prices transparent have had little if any effect on improving health care market functioning and changing patient behavior. Although price transparency is still in its infancy, it holds promise to be as useful to patient-consumers as it has been to large purchasers (eg, employers) of health services and policymakers. But even if price information is not routinely used by patients, transparency of such information still has ethical importance in a market in which patients pay increasingly high out-of-pocket costs.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresHealth ServicesConsumer BehaviorDelivery of Health CareHumans

Identifiers

PMID36342488
PMCPMC10861144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.